Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

was corrected by

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "was corrected by" is correct and can be used in written English.
It is typically used to indicate that one person corrected an action performed by someone else. For example: "The mistakes in the document were corrected by the teacher."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

QT interval was corrected by Fridericia's formula (QTcF).

This caused a heart defect that was corrected by surgery.

That was corrected by a trip to Rye, a town giddy with retro tat emporiums.

Most recombinants were unstable, but this was corrected by mutation of the flanking cleavage sites.

"As soon as that review was completed, the record was corrected by the attorney general and by the foreign minister".

News & Media

The Guardian

Another added, "Caine is like Justin Bieber," but was corrected by the third: "He's cooler than Justin Bieber.

News & Media

The New Yorker

The problem of the Durbin model was corrected by the Ω model.

If such a report was corrected by the lecturer himself, it became a reportatio examinata.

She was corrected by the Bishop of Chester: "I'm afraid you misunderstand, Prime Minister.

News & Media

Independent

This was corrected by the creation of the new genus, with the type species Pseudotrichonympha hertwigi 6.

Science & Research

Nature

The binding energy was corrected by setting active carbon sp2 C 1s of 284.5 eV as the reference.

Science & Research

Nature
Show more...

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "was corrected by", ensure the subject clearly identifies what was initially incorrect and who or what performed the correction.

Common error

Avoid ambiguity by clearly stating who or what made the correction. For example, instead of "The mistake was corrected", specify "The mistake was corrected by the editor."

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

84%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "was corrected by" functions as a passive voice construction. It indicates that the subject of the sentence underwent a change (correction) performed by an agent. Ludwig AI confirms its correctness and common usage.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

62%

News & Media

33%

Formal & Business

3%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

1%

Wiki

1%

Social Media

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "was corrected by" is a versatile and grammatically correct way to express that something inaccurate has been rectified, as confirmed by Ludwig. It's most commonly found in scientific and news contexts, maintaining a neutral register suitable for diverse audiences. Remember to clearly identify both the error and the agent of correction to avoid ambiguity. Consider alternatives like "was adjusted by" or "was rectified by" for subtle variations in meaning. Ludwig AI confirms the frequent usage of "was corrected by" across a wide range of reliable sources, making it a valuable addition to your writing toolkit.

FAQs

How can I use "was corrected by" in a sentence?

Use "was corrected by" to indicate that an error or inaccuracy was fixed by someone or something. For example: "The initial report was incorrect, but it "was corrected by" the investigative team."

What's a more formal way to say "was corrected by"?

For a more formal tone, consider using "was rectified by" or "was amended by". These phrases convey a similar meaning while maintaining a higher level of formality.

What can I say instead of "was corrected by" in a scientific paper?

In scientific writing, consider using more precise alternatives like "was adjusted by", "was calibrated by", or "was refined by", depending on the context.

Is it always necessary to specify who or what "was corrected by"?

While not always grammatically required, specifying who or what performed the correction often adds clarity and context to the statement.

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

84%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: