was revised by

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "was revised by" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to indicate that a document or piece of work has been modified or edited by someone else. Example: "The report was revised by the senior editor to ensure accuracy and clarity."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Wiki

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

The book was revised by Harvey Fierstein.

The New Yorker

But Tuesday, the history was revised — by a second.

The New York Times

Metastasio's libretto was revised by Caterino Mazzola, presumably to Mozart's specifications.

The New York Times - Arts

It was revised by its authors for two movie versions (in 1936 and 1951) and for subsequent stage outings.

The New York Times

But in 1937 the chimney-sweep law was revised by Heinrich Himmler, then the acting interior minister.

The Economist

(a4) was revised by Wongchan and Saejung [12] (Proposition 2).

Journal of Inequalities and Applications

This approach was revised by Jourani and Thibault [5].

Journal of Inequalities and Applications

Their histopathologic classification was revised by the World Health Organization (WHO) in 2003.

Gynecologic Oncology

The process of labeling of these images was revised by the expert pathologist.

Alexandria Engineering Journal

The absolute configuration of vibralactone B was revised by single crystal X-ray diffraction analysis.

Natural Products and Bioprospecting

The distinction between fundamental and derived measurement was revised by subsequent authors.

SEP

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "was revised by", ensure that the agent performing the revision is clearly identified to provide context and accountability.

Common error

Avoid using "was revised by" without specifying who did the revising. This omission can lead to ambiguity and reduce the clarity of your statement.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "was revised by" functions as a passive voice construction, indicating that something underwent modification or alteration. As Ludwig AI confirms, this phrase is grammatically correct and commonly used. Examples show it applied to various subjects like books, laws, and documents.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

53%

News & Media

27%

Wiki

17%

Less common in

Formal & Business

1%

Encyclopedias

1%

Reference

1%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "was revised by" is a grammatically correct and commonly used passive construction that indicates something has been modified or altered by a specific agent. According to Ludwig AI, the phrase is suitable for various writing contexts, though it is especially prevalent in formal and scientific domains. Ensure clarity by always specifying who performed the revision, and consider using active voice for more direct communication. Alternatives such as ""was edited by"" or ""was modified by"" may be suitable depending on the context.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

was edited by

Replaces "revised" with "edited", focusing on corrections and improvements.

was amended by

Substitutes "revised" with "amended", suggesting formal changes or additions.

was modified by

Uses "modified" instead of "revised", indicating alterations or adjustments.

was updated by

Replaces "revised" with "updated", implying newer information was incorporated.

was altered by

Uses "altered" instead of "revised", suggesting a change in form or character.

was corrected by

Substitutes "revised" with "corrected", focusing on the removal of errors.

was reworked by

Replaces "revised" with "reworked", implying significant changes and improvements.

was rewritten by

Uses "rewritten" instead of "revised", indicating a complete reconstruction of the text.

was adapted by

Substitutes "revised" with "adapted", suggesting changes made to suit a new purpose.

underwent revision by

Changes the sentence structure to use "underwent revision" instead of the passive voice.

FAQs

How can I use "was revised by" in a sentence?

You can use "was revised by" to indicate that a document, text, or process has been modified or edited by someone. For example, "The report was revised by the senior editor".

What are some alternatives to "was revised by"?

Alternatives include "was edited by", "was amended by", or "was modified by", depending on the specific context and type of change made.

Is it better to use active or passive voice with "was revised by"?

While "was revised by" is in the passive voice, using the active voice (e.g., "The editor revised the report") can often make your writing more direct and concise.

What's the difference between "was revised by" and "was reviewed by"?

"Was revised by" implies changes were made, while "was reviewed by" suggests an evaluation or assessment without necessarily indicating modifications. A document "was reviewed by" someone who may or may not have suggested changes that led to its revision.