Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
was corroborated with
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "was corroborated with" is not correct in standard written English.
The correct expression is "was corroborated by" or "was corroborated with evidence." Example: "The witness's account was corroborated by video footage from the scene."
⚠ May contain grammatical issues
Science
News & Media
Alternative expressions(18)
was confirmed by
was supported by
was verified by
confirmed by
was validated by
was substantiated by
aligned with
harmonized with
was in agreement with
was concurred with
was consolidated with
was reinforced with
was demonstrated with
was substantiated with
was ascertained with
was confirmed with
was testified with
was verified with
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
35 human-written examples
He said he and MacKean had a scoop, which was corroborated with footage from the 1970s and interviews with girls at Duncroft school, yet it was killed by the BBC.
News & Media
The existence of Si-ncs in the SiO x films was corroborated with the HRTEM measurements.
Science
The sensor response was corroborated with the output of thermal conductivity detector (TCD) based system.
Surface morphology revealed that the biosheet supported fibroblast cell attachment, and this result was corroborated with the MTT assay.
Science
The electrochemical response of the system was corroborated with SEM pictures, gravimetric measurements and X-ray fluorescence analysis.
Science
Structuring of the enzyme in β-sheets was preserved in the form of 1-layer LB film, which was corroborated with a higher catalytic activity than for other uricase-containing LB film architectures where the β-sheets structuring was not preserved.
Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources
Similar Expressions
25 human-written examples
Their accounts were corroborated with residents and local government officials.
News & Media
This is corroborated with other sources.
These have been corroborated with conventional analyses.
Numerical results are corroborated with experiments.
Results are corroborated with numerical simulations.
Science
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
Use "was corroborated by" instead of "was corroborated with" for grammatically correct phrasing.
Common error
Avoid using "with" after "corroborated". The correct preposition to use is "by" to indicate the means or method of corroboration.
Source & Trust
84%
Authority and reliability
2.8/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "was corroborated with" functions as a passive construction, indicating that something received confirmation or support through a particular means. However, Ludwig AI points out it's not standard English; "was corroborated by" is the preferred phrasing.
Frequent in
Science
80%
News & Media
10%
Formal & Business
0%
Less common in
Encyclopedias
0%
Wiki
0%
Reference
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
In summary, while the phrase "was corroborated with" appears in numerous sources, Ludwig AI marks it as grammatically incorrect. The preferred and more standard construction is "was corroborated by". This phrase functions to provide support or confirmation for a statement or finding. Given its prevalence in scientific and news contexts, it's often used in formal writing. To maintain grammatical accuracy, substituting it with "was supported by" or "was confirmed by" is advisable. It's essential to prioritize correctness over frequency when using this type of language.
More alternative expressions(6)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
was supported by
Replaces "corroborated with" with a more general term for providing evidence.
was confirmed by
Uses a stronger term, "confirmed", suggesting a higher degree of certainty.
was verified by
Indicates that something was checked and found to be true.
was validated by
Suggests that something was proven to be accurate or justified.
was substantiated by
Replaces "corroborated with" by providing evidence to prove the truth of something.
was backed up by
Uses a more informal term, "backed up", for providing support or evidence.
was borne out by
Indicates that something was confirmed or supported by subsequent events or evidence.
aligned with
Focuses on the agreement or consistency between different pieces of information.
harmonized with
Emphasizes the compatibility or agreement between different elements.
was in agreement with
States a direct correspondence or alignment with other information.
FAQs
What is the correct way to use the word "corroborate" in a sentence?
The verb "corroborate" means to confirm or support a statement, theory, or finding. The correct preposition is "by", as in "The evidence was corroborated by witnesses."
What can I say instead of "was corroborated with"?
You can use phrases like "was supported by", "was confirmed by", or "was verified by".
Is it ever correct to use "with" after "corroborated"?
While less common, "corroborated with evidence" is acceptable. However, "corroborated by" is generally preferred, offering a more concise and direct phrasing.
What is the difference between "corroborated by" and "confirmed by"?
"Corroborated by" implies that additional evidence supports an existing claim, while "confirmed by" suggests that the claim has been definitively proven true. The phrase "confirmed by" indicates a stronger degree of certainty.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
84%
Authority and reliability
2.8/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested