was confirmed with

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "was confirmed with" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when indicating that something has been verified or validated in conjunction with a person or entity. Example: "The meeting details were confirmed with the project manager before sending out the invitations."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Academia

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Correct needle placement was confirmed with fluoroscopy.

Stanford University

Mr. Negroponte was confirmed with unexpected ease.

The New York Times

Its species origin was confirmed with PCR.

Nature

This was confirmed with a breathalyzer test.

The New York Times - Travel

Identification of dansylated dipeptides was confirmed with synthetic standards.

Stanford University

ME2's presence was confirmed with immunoblotting.

Archives of Biochemistry and Biophysics

Synthesis was confirmed with nuclear magnetic resonance.

Acta Materialia

The structure expansion was confirmed with PXRD.

Catalysis Today

McIlroy's insurmountable position was confirmed with six holes to play.

The Guardian - Sport

Transfection was confirmed with fluorescence microscopy and western blot (CYP1A1).

Nature

Lesion placement was confirmed with post hoc immunohistochemistry (Figure 1a).

Nature

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "was confirmed with", ensure that the 'with' phrase clearly identifies the method, tool, or evidence that provided the confirmation. This clarifies the basis for the verification.

Common error

Avoid using "was confirmed with" without specifying what the confirmation came from. For example, instead of saying "The hypothesis was confirmed with data", specify the type of data: "The hypothesis was confirmed with experimental data".

Linguistic Context

The phrase "was confirmed with" functions as a passive construction used to indicate that a particular fact, hypothesis, or result has been verified or validated by a specific means. Ludwig examples show it's frequently followed by a method, instrument, or type of data.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

64%

News & Media

15%

Academia

12%

Less common in

Formal & Business

8%

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "was confirmed with" is a grammatically sound and very common expression used to denote verification or validation of information. As Ludwig AI indicates, it sees widespread application across scientific, academic, and news media contexts. To ensure clarity and precision, it's essential to specify the means by which the confirmation was achieved. Alternative phrases such as "was verified by" or "was substantiated by" can offer stylistic variation while maintaining semantic equivalence. The key is to provide context and clarity in how the confirmation was established.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

was verified by

Replaces "confirmed" with "verified", emphasizing the act of checking or proving something's truth.

was substantiated by

Substitutes "confirmed" with "substantiated", indicating provision of evidence to support the claim.

was validated through

Uses "validated" instead of "confirmed", highlighting the process of establishing the soundness or correctness.

was corroborated by

Replaces "confirmed" with "corroborated", suggesting that additional evidence supports the initial finding.

was authenticated by

Uses "authenticated" instead of "confirmed", indicating that something has been proven genuine.

was demonstrated by

Substitutes "confirmed" with "demonstrated", emphasizing the act of showing or proving something clearly.

was verified using

Focuses on the tool or method used for verification rather than direct confirmation.

evidence supported

Shifts the focus to the evidence as the subject, rather than the confirmation itself.

findings aligned with

Indicates agreement or consistency with other results or data.

results supported by

Highlights that the outcome was backed or reinforced by particular results.

FAQs

What does "was confirmed with" mean?

The phrase "was confirmed with" indicates that a statement, fact, or finding has been verified or validated using a specific method, tool, or piece of evidence. It signifies that something has been proven true or accurate through the use of supporting information.

How can I rephrase "was confirmed with" to sound more formal?

For a more formal tone, you could use phrases like "was substantiated by", "was corroborated by", or "was validated through". These alternatives add a layer of sophistication while maintaining the original meaning.

What are some common things that are "confirmed with"?

Common things that are "confirmed with" include experimental results, data analysis, expert opinions, witness testimonies, and documentary evidence. The specific element used for confirmation depends on the context of the statement being verified.

Is it better to use active or passive voice with "was confirmed with"?

The phrase "was confirmed with" is in the passive voice. While grammatically correct, using the active voice might be more direct and concise in some cases. For example, instead of "The diagnosis was confirmed with a biopsy", you could say "A biopsy confirmed the diagnosis".