was appended

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "was appended" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to indicate that something has been added or attached to a document, file, or piece of information. Example: "The new section was appended to the end of the report for clarity."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Encyclopedias

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

This footnote was appended on 16 December.

The Guardian - Opinion

The next day it was appended to the prosecutor's report.

The Guardian

A disclosure was appended to the Snow Leopard column online.

The New York Times

This footnote was appended on 12 October 2015.

The Guardian - Opinion

Her only apology was appended with a "lol".

The Guardian - Music

This footnote was appended on 26 July 2011.

The Guardian - Books

Some time later a fourth act was appended.

Encyclopedia Britannica

Henderson's face was appended to dancing iPods, spinning iPods, hardcore porn scenes.

The New York Times - Magazine

This footnote was appended on 9 May 2012 to clarify the reference to armistice commemorations.

The Guardian

This week's TV highlights Full TV listings This footnote was appended on 30 October 2013.

The Guardian - TV & Radio

This footnote was appended on 1 September 2014: strictly speaking, The Moomins are Finnish.

The Guardian - TV & Radio

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "was appended" when you want to clearly indicate that something has been added as a supplement or attachment to an existing document or piece of information. Ensure the context makes it clear what is being added and to what it is being appended.

Common error

While "was appended" is generally acceptable, be mindful of its slightly formal tone. In very informal contexts, consider using simpler alternatives like "was added" or "was attached".

Linguistic Context

The phrase "was appended" functions as a passive verb phrase, indicating that something has been added to something else. This construction is commonly used to describe the addition of notes, clauses, or other information to a main body of text or data. As Ludwig AI confirms, this is a grammatically sound construction.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

36%

News & Media

35%

Encyclopedias

7%

Less common in

Wiki

5%

Formal & Business

2%

Social Media

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "was appended" is a grammatically correct and commonly used passive verb phrase that indicates something has been added or attached to something else. As Ludwig AI confirms, the phrase is widely applicable and considered correct. It is particularly prevalent in scientific, news media, and encyclopedic contexts. While slightly formal, it remains versatile for various writing purposes. Remember to use it when you want to clearly indicate an addition or attachment, and consider simpler alternatives like "was added" in very informal settings.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

was added

A more general term indicating something was joined to something else.

was attached

Indicates a physical or close connection was made.

was affixed

Suggests a more formal or permanent attachment.

was annexed

Implies incorporation into a larger body.

was supplemented

Highlights the augmentation or completion aspect of the addition.

was tagged

Indicates an association or label was added.

was joined

Focuses on the act of connecting or uniting.

was included

Highlights the act of containing something within a whole.

was incorporated

Highlights the act of integration into a larger system.

was subjoined

A less common synonym that emphasizes being added at the end.

FAQs

How do I use "was appended" in a sentence?

The phrase "was appended" is used to indicate that something has been added to something else. For example, "A footnote "was appended" to the document for clarification."

What can I say instead of "was appended"?

You can use alternatives like "was added", "was attached", or "was included" depending on the context.

Is it correct to say "is appended" instead of "was appended"?

The choice between "is appended" and "was appended" depends on the tense. "Is appended" implies the action of appending is happening in the present, while "was appended" indicates it happened in the past.

What is the difference between "was appended" and "was attached"?

While both indicate something being joined to something else, "was attached" often implies a physical connection, whereas ""was appended"" suggests an addition of information or content.