was added

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "was added" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to indicate that something has been included or incorporated into a larger context or document in the past. Example: "The new section was added to the report to provide more clarity on the subject."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Encyclopedias

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

59 human-written examples

One was added.

The New York Times - Tech

Some water was added.

Independent

Syria was added later.

The Economist

A screened porch was added.

The New York Times

Insult was added to injury.

The New York Times - Science

A "footnote" was added later.

Encyclopedia Britannica

Paneling was added or changed.

The New York Times - Arts

A conservatory was added later.

The New York Times

Khat was added in June.

Independent

Pearl Harbor was added.

The New York Times - Magazine

So Memuna was added to the list.

The New Yorker

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "was added", ensure the context clearly indicates what is being added and to what it is being added. For example, specify "a new feature was added to the software".

Common error

Avoid using "was added" without specifying what or where. Instead of saying "something was added", clarify the statement: "a detailed explanation was added to the document".

Linguistic Context

The phrase "was added" functions as a passive voice construction, indicating that something received the action of being added. As confirmed by Ludwig, it's a standard and acceptable grammatical structure.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

36%

News & Media

34%

Encyclopedias

5%

Less common in

Wiki

3%

Formal & Business

0%

Social Media

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "was added" is a common and grammatically correct passive voice construction used to indicate that something has been included or incorporated. Ludwig AI confirms its validity and widespread use. It appears most frequently in scientific and news contexts. When using this phrase, ensure clarity by specifying what is being added and to what. While versatile, be mindful of potential vagueness and opt for more descriptive alternatives when appropriate. This ensures your writing is both accurate and informative.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

was included

Replaces "added" with "included", implying incorporation into a group or set.

was incorporated

Uses "incorporated" to suggest a more formal or integral inclusion.

was appended

Suggests something attached or added as a supplement.

was attached

Indicates a physical or close association being made.

was joined

Implies a merging or uniting of elements.

was introduced

Highlights the act of bringing something new into a situation.

was supplemented

Indicates something added to enhance or complete.

was affixed

Suggests something fastened or attached, often physically.

was integrated

Implies a seamless combination or unification.

was inserted

Indicates placement within something else.

FAQs

How can I use "was added" in a sentence?

Use "was added" to indicate that something has been included or incorporated into something else. For example: "The final scene "was added" to create a more impactful ending".

What can I say instead of "was added"?

You can use alternatives like "was included", "was incorporated", or "was appended" depending on the specific context.

Is it correct to say "was add" instead of "was added"?

No, "was add" is grammatically incorrect. The correct form is ""was added"", which uses the past participle of the verb "add".

What's the difference between "was added" and "has been added"?

"Was added" indicates a completed action in the past, whereas "has been added" indicates a completed action with relevance to the present. For example, "The update was added yesterday" versus "The update has been added and is now available".