vetted against

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "vetted against" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it to indicate that something has been checked for accuracy. For example: "All the facts in the report have been vetted against existing records to ensure accuracy."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Academia

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

15 human-written examples

In particular, people want to know what the Labour party values are that people are being vetted against.

The Guardian - Opinion

"The number is much better founded as a technical potential than what we had before, and it is vetted against what is sustainable," said Lehmann.

Cornell University

For instance, general aviation pilots and aircraft owners are vetted against terrorist watch lists, and pilots are required to hold a tamper-proof ID issued by the government.

The New York Times

As De Waal has written, "Imagine the cognitive burden if every decision we took needed to be vetted against handed-down principles".

The Guardian

While many prediction methods are found to work in the literature, the results of this study show that these methods have only been compared to their original data, but have not been vetted against a large database covering many fluids, plate designs and test conditions.

International Journal of Refrigeration

Open-ended interviews were conducted under confidentiality agreements with 33 technology entrepreneurs vetted against the above criteria.

Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

45 human-written examples

Elon Musk could be suspended as the chief executive of Tesla over tweets the SEC said were not properly vetted and went against an SEC settlement, CNBC reports.

BBC

Ever since the semi-independent Office of Congressional Ethics was created two years ago to vet allegations against lawmakers, cynics wondered how soon it would fall into the find-no-evil track record of the House ethics committee it serves.

The New York Times

Its quicker-to-declines results are hard to read positively, except the following perspective: Snap grew so quickly that vetting it against the results of historically similar companies is silly.

TechCrunch

I can't vet it against what Android offers given that I've been off that code for some time, but given my memory, it seems at least commensurate.

TechCrunch

In countries where these schemes are being piloted: Guatemala, Kenya, Lebanon, the Philippines and the Ukraine - a diversity and spread clearly indicating the global intention and scope of the programs - NGOs are given the opportunity to step aside and allow individuals and contractors to vet themselves against the secretive database of groups.

HuffPost

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "vetted against", ensure the comparison standard is clearly defined to provide context for the evaluation. For example, "The proposal was vetted against the company's strategic goals."

Common error

Avoid using "vetted against" without specifying what the subject is being compared to. Saying "The candidate was vetted" is incomplete; clarify with "The candidate was vetted against the job requirements."

Linguistic Context

The phrase "vetted against" functions as a passive construction indicating that a subject has undergone a thorough examination and comparison with a set of standards, criteria, or information. Ludwig highlights the phrase as grammatically correct.

Expression frequency: Common

Frequent in

News & Media

53%

Science

33%

Academia

13%

Less common in

Formal & Business

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "vetted against" is a grammatically correct and commonly used expression that signifies a thorough examination and comparison process. Ludwig AI confirms the phrase's validity and usability in written English. It is frequently found in news and media, scientific publications, and academic writing, indicating its widespread acceptance and application across various domains. When using "vetted against", ensure clarity by specifying the comparison standard to provide context. Alternatives such as "scrutinized against", "checked against", and "evaluated against" can be used to add nuance to your writing. Be mindful not to omit what the subject is being compared to.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

checked against

Suggests a comparison to verify accuracy or validity.

validated against

Highlights the process of confirming the accuracy or legitimacy of something.

scrutinized against

Focuses on close and critical examination, emphasizing thoroughness.

tested against

Suggests a trial or experiment to determine performance or reliability.

verified with

Emphasizes confirming truth or accuracy using external evidence.

examined against

Implies a detailed inspection or investigation.

assessed against

Similar to evaluated, but can imply a more formal or systematic judgment.

evaluated against

Highlights the assessment of worth or quality in relation to something else.

measured against

Emphasizes a standard or benchmark for comparison.

compared with

Focuses on identifying similarities and differences.

FAQs

How to use "vetted against" in a sentence?

Use "vetted against" to show that something has been carefully examined and compared to a standard. For example, "All data was "validated against" existing records."

What can I say instead of "vetted against"?

You can use alternatives like "scrutinized against", "checked against", or "evaluated against" depending on the specific context.

Which is correct, "vetted against" or "vetted with"?

"Vetted against" is generally used to indicate a comparison or assessment against a standard or criteria, while "vetted with" is less common and might suggest collaboration in the vetting process. "vetted against" is more precise when showing a comparison.

What's the difference between "vetted against" and "reviewed by"?

"Vetted against" implies a comparative assessment against specific criteria, while "reviewed by" simply means that someone has examined it. For example, "The document was "reviewed by" the committee", vs "The document was vetted against the new regulations".