reviewed by

USAGE SUMMARY

"reviewed by" is correct and usable in written English.
This phrase is commonly used as part of a phrase or clause that indicates that something has been evaluated and scrutinized by someone. For example: The report was reviewed by two experts before it was published.

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

57 human-written examples

Reviewed by replay.

The New York Times

Reviewed by Harold Evans.

The New York Times

Reviewed by Alessandra Stanley.

The New York Times

Reviewed by A. O. Scott.

The New York Times

prospectus, which is reviewed by the S.E.C.

The New York Times

"Camino Real" (1953), reviewed by Wolcott Gibbs.

The New Yorker

Reviewed by Siddhartha Deb 17 knockemstiff.

The New York Times

Novelists are reviewed by fellow novelists.

The Guardian - Opinion

"Wild River" (1960), reviewed by John McCarten.

The New Yorker

Reviewed by Robert D. Kaplan 11 crime.

The New York Times

Reviewed by David Kamp 26 somebody scream!

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "reviewed by", ensure that you clearly identify the reviewer and their credentials or expertise to add credibility to the review process. For example, instead of just stating "The manuscript was reviewed by experts", specify "The manuscript was reviewed by Dr. Smith, a leading expert in the field of oncology."

Common error

Avoid ambiguity by ensuring the subject of the review is clear. Instead of writing "The proposal was reviewed", specify "The proposal was reviewed by the committee" to avoid confusion about who performed the review.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "reviewed by" functions as a prepositional phrase, typically used in the passive voice to indicate the agent performing the action of reviewing. Ludwig AI confirms this, as it highlights its common usage across various contexts. It modifies a noun or noun phrase, specifying who or what conducted the review process. For example, "The manuscript was reviewed by experts."

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

65%

Science

29%

Wiki

3%

Less common in

Formal & Business

1%

Encyclopedias

1%

Reference

1%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "reviewed by" is a versatile and grammatically sound phrase used to indicate who performed an assessment or evaluation. Ludwig AI confirms its correct and frequent usage across various contexts, including news, science, and general writing. The phrase generally maintains a neutral tone, suitable for both formal and informal communication. To enhance clarity, always specify the reviewer and avoid ambiguity by clearly stating what was reviewed. Considering its prevalence in authoritative sources, mastering the use of "reviewed by" can improve your writing style.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

assessed by

Focuses on the act of evaluating or judging something's quality or importance; emphasizes the judgment aspect more than the process of review.

evaluated by

Highlights the systematic determination of merit, worth, or significance, often involving specific criteria.

examined by

Emphasizes a detailed inspection or investigation, often for detecting flaws or understanding something thoroughly.

scrutinized by

Implies a very careful and critical examination, often looking for potential problems or inconsistencies.

checked by

Suggests a verification process to ensure accuracy or correctness, often a routine procedure.

inspected by

Highlights a formal or official examination, often to ensure compliance with standards or regulations.

vetted by

Suggests a thorough investigation of someone or something's background, often to determine suitability for a role or position.

audited by

Specifically refers to a systematic examination of financial records or accounts.

overseen by

Focuses on the act of supervising or managing something, implying a broader level of control than a simple review.

approved by

Highlights the granting of permission or endorsement after a review process.

FAQs

How can I use "reviewed by" in a sentence?

Use "reviewed by" to indicate who has assessed or evaluated something. For example, "The manuscript was reviewed by three independent experts" or "The policy was reviewed by the legal department".

What are some alternatives to "reviewed by"?

You can use alternatives like "assessed by", "evaluated by", or "examined by" depending on the context.

Is it better to use active or passive voice with "reviewed by"?

While both active and passive voice can be grammatically correct, using the active voice often leads to clearer and more concise sentences. For example, instead of "The report was reviewed by the committee", consider "The committee reviewed the report."

What's the difference between "reviewed by" and "proofread by"?

"Reviewed by" implies a comprehensive assessment of content and quality, while "proofread by" focuses specifically on correcting errors in grammar, spelling, and punctuation. The terms are not interchangeable. A document might be reviewed for its arguments and later "proofread by" someone else.