validated against

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "validated against" is correct and usable in written English.
It is used to mean that something has been checked against a set of criteria to ensure that it meets the necessary standards. For example, "The results of the study were validated against established protocols."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

Academia

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Results were validated against an independent validation cohort.

Arthritis and Rheumatology

Results are validated against postoperative clinical data.

Stanford University

Element children are validated against their declarations.

University of California, Berkeley

The results are validated against experiments.

Carbon

The code is validated against linear theory.

Journal of Computational Physics

The hesitancy categories were validated against immunization behaviours.

Nature

Results were validated against published kinetic data.

Chemical Engineering Science

These Formulae were validated against field measurements.

Alexandria Engineering Journal

The model was validated against measured data.

Sensors and Actuators A: Physical

Our results were validated against analytical methods.

Journal of Biomechanics

The model is validated against experimental data.

Applied Thermal Engineering

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "validated against", ensure that the standard or benchmark you are comparing against is clearly defined and credible. For instance, specify "validated against established industry standards" or "validated against peer-reviewed data."

Common error

Avoid using "validated against" without specifying what the validation was performed against. For example, saying "The model was validated" is less informative than "The model was validated against experimental data."

Linguistic Context

The phrase "validated against" functions as a prepositional phrase that modifies a verb, typically in the passive voice. It indicates that a subject (e.g., a model, results) has been checked or confirmed for accuracy by comparing it to a known standard, dataset, or established criteria. As confirmed by Ludwig AI, it conveys a confirmation process.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

60%

Academia

30%

News & Media

10%

Less common in

Formal & Business

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "validated against" is a prepositional phrase commonly used to indicate that something has been checked for accuracy by comparing it with a standard or dataset. Ludwig AI confirms its proper usage in various contexts, particularly in scientific and academic writing. The phrase functions to establish reliability and credibility, ensuring transparency in the validation process. While it is most frequent in science and academic contexts, it maintains a formal and scientific register. When using the term, it's crucial to clearly define the validation criteria and benchmarks. Alternatives include "verified with" and "checked against", each offering slightly different nuances. Be cautious of vague validation references to maintain clarity and precision in writing.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

verified with

Focuses on confirming accuracy through comparison.

checked against

Emphasizes the act of inspecting something for correctness.

compared with

Highlights the process of assessing similarities and differences.

tested against

Implies a more rigorous examination to determine performance or reliability.

benchmarked against

Suggests a comparison against a recognized standard.

measured against

Focuses on quantitative assessment relative to a specific criterion.

assessed in relation to

Implies a comprehensive evaluation considering various factors.

evaluated with reference to

Highlights that something is evaluated with a specific source of information.

cross-validated with

Used in statistical contexts to confirm the validity of results.

corroborated by

Stresses that something is supported or confirmed by another source.

FAQs

How to use "validated against" in a sentence?

Use "validated against" to indicate that something has been checked or confirmed by comparing it with a known standard or reliable data. For example, "The new algorithm was "validated against" existing benchmarks."

What can I say instead of "validated against"?

You can use alternatives like "verified with", "checked against", or "compared with" depending on the context.

Is it correct to say "the results validate the model" instead of "the model was validated against the results"?

Yes, both are correct but have slightly different emphases. "The results validate the model" emphasizes the results as evidence. "The model was "validated against" the results" focuses on the validation process of the model.

What is the difference between "validated against" and "confirmed by"?

"Validated against" implies a structured comparison with a standard or dataset, whereas "confirmed by" suggests general support or agreement from another source. For example, a scientific model might be ""validated against" experimental data" and "confirmed by" other scientists' findings.