that involved

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "that involved" is correct and usable in written English.
It is used to indicate that something has a part in causing the current situation. For example, "He was angry because of the mistakes that involved his work."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

59 human-written examples

That involved obtaining three separate permits.

The New York Times

That involved much less church work...

The New York Times - Books

That involved, sensibly enough, consulting his wife.

The New Yorker

That involved a period of self discovery.

The Guardian - Music

That involved climbing a 12-foot-high, spike-topped wall.

The New York Times - Arts

How much worldwide marketing expertise has that involved?

The Guardian - Sport

I had planned a project that involved historical research.

The New York Times

Vacations were an affair that involved the press.

The New York Times

That involved more than 1,300 stores in 22 states.

The New York Times - Science

They rejected any deal that involved raising taxes.

The New York Times

bridge project that involved public officials and community leaders.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Consider replacing "that involved" with stronger verbs like 'required', 'included', or 'entailed' to add precision to your writing and make your language more vivid.

Common error

Avoid using "that involved" without a clear subject or context. For example, instead of saying 'The process involved...', specify 'The process that involved multiple departments...' to provide clarity.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "that involved" functions as a relative clause, modifying a noun and providing additional information about it. It connects a noun to an action, process, or element directly related to it. As Ludwig AI explains, it shows something has a part in causing the current situation.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

52%

Science

24%

Wiki

8%

Less common in

Formal & Business

4%

Encyclopedias

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "that involved" functions as a relative clause to add essential details or context to a noun, specifying related actions or elements. Ludwig AI confirms its grammatical correctness. It's a versatile phrase found across numerous domains, most commonly in news and media and scientific writing. To improve writing, ensure clarity by explicitly stating the elements included or affected and consider replacing it with more precise verbs like 'required' or 'entailed'. Keep in mind, source diversity indicates a generally neutral register. By understanding its function, purpose, and common contexts, you can effectively integrate "that involved" into your writing.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

which included

Replaces "involved" with "included", focusing on listing the components or elements.

that comprised

Emphasizes the composition or constitution of something.

that entailed

Highlights the consequences or necessary steps.

that incorporated

Focuses on the act of integrating something into a larger whole.

that necessitated

Stresses the idea that something was required or made necessary.

which pertained to

Indicates a connection or relevance to a specific subject.

that concerned

Highlights the focus or subject matter.

that touched upon

Suggests a brief or indirect reference.

associated with

Highlights a relationship or connection between two things.

related to

Indicates a general connection or association.

FAQs

How can I use "that involved" in a sentence?

You can use "that involved" to describe a component, aspect, or action integral to a process or event. For example, "The project that involved extensive research was a success."

What are some alternatives to using "that involved"?

You can use alternatives like "which included", "that entailed", or "associated with" depending on the context.

Is it better to use "that involved" or "which involved"?

Both "that involved" and "which involved" are grammatically correct. "That involved" is typically used in restrictive clauses that are essential to the sentence's meaning, while "which involved" is used in non-restrictive clauses that add extra information.

How does "that involved" differ from "that included"?

"That involved" suggests a broader connection or implication, while "that included" focuses specifically on listing the elements or components of something.