associated with

USAGE SUMMARY

"associated with" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it to describe a connection between two people, places, things, or ideas. For example, "Her writing style is closely associated with her mentors."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Encyclopedias

Science

Wiki

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

associated with infected feed.

The New York Times - Health

It's associated with New Orleans.

The New York Times - Food

It's closely associated with Nicollette".

Independent

Coughing is associated with pneumonia.

Encyclopedia Britannica

often associated with child abuse.

The New Yorker

It's associated with Pets.com.com

The New York Times

"It's associated with guilt".

The Guardian

He's associated with them.

The New Yorker

associated with this disease.

The New York Times - Magazine

There is tremendous anxiety associated with that.

The New York Times

Golf is often associated with exclusivity.

The New York Times - Sports

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "associated with" to clearly indicate a relationship or connection between two or more things. Ensure the connection is logical and evident within the context of your writing.

Common error

Avoid using "associated with" excessively in passive constructions. Active voice often provides a clearer and more direct way to express the relationship. For example, instead of "The disease is associated with poor hygiene", try "Poor hygiene is associated with the disease."

Linguistic Context

The phrase "associated with" functions as a prepositional phrase, indicating a relationship or connection between two entities. This is evident in examples where diseases are linked to certain conditions or activities, as shown in Ludwig's examples.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

32%

Science

23%

Encyclopedias

15%

Less common in

Wiki

14%

Formal & Business

10%

Reference

6%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "associated with" is a versatile prepositional phrase used to denote a relationship or connection between two subjects, as confirmed by Ludwig. Its usage spans across various contexts, from formal academic writing to informal news articles. While grammatically correct and very common, careful consideration should be given to the specific nature of the relationship being described, with alternatives like "linked to" or "related to" offering nuanced meanings. Remember to avoid overuse in passive constructions for clearer, more direct writing.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

linked to

Indicates a direct connection, often implying causality or a clear relationship.

related to

A general term for connection, lacking the implication of direct cause or effect.

connected with

Similar to "related to", but implies a more tangible or direct link.

in connection with

Suggests involvement or relevance to a particular subject or event.

tied to

Implies a strong or inseparable link, often suggesting dependence.

attributed to

Indicates a cause-and-effect relationship, assigning something as a result of something else.

in relation to

Emphasizes the comparative aspect of the connection.

correlated with

Highlights a statistical relationship, but doesn't necessarily imply causation.

involving

Suggests participation or inclusion in something.

relevant to

Indicates pertinence or applicability to a specific topic or situation.

FAQs

How can I use "associated with" in a sentence?

Use "associated with" to show a relationship or connection between two things. For instance, "Stress is "associated with" various health problems."

What are some alternatives to "associated with"?

You can use phrases like "linked to", "related to", or "connected with" as alternatives depending on the context.

Is it correct to say "caused by" instead of "associated with"?

While both indicate a relationship, "caused by" implies a direct causal link, whereas "associated with" suggests a correlation but not necessarily a cause-and-effect relationship. If you want to demonstrate causality, use "caused by"; otherwise, ""associated with"" is more appropriate.

What is the difference between "associated with" and "related to"?

"Associated with" and "related to" are similar, but "associated with" often implies a stronger or more direct connection than "related to". Use "associated with" when there's a notable or established relationship.