that included

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "that included" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it to indicate that something was part of a larger group or set. For example: "The study included participants from several different countries."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

58 human-written examples

Options that included Sanchez.

The New York Times - Sports

Unfortunately, that included negative traits.

The New York Times

And that included the band.

The New York Times

And that included horniness".

The Guardian - Film

Limitations that included Mr. Romero's micro-budget.

The New York Times

Actually, that included feeding a few guests.

The New York Times

And that included Pitt fans.

The New York Times - Sports

The King asked if that included Iran.

The Guardian

By a group that included Mr. Reyes?

The New York Times

And that included dog-walking.

BBC

And that included me.

Huffington Post

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "that included" to clearly specify examples or components of a broader category or action. For instance, "The project team focused on several key areas, that included market research and product development."

Common error

Avoid using "that included" for simple lists where a direct listing with "and" or commas is clearer. Instead of "The menu that included soup, salad, and bread," prefer "The menu included soup, salad, and bread."

Linguistic Context

The phrase "that included" functions as a relative clause introducing specific elements contained within a broader category or set. Ludwig AI affirms this usage through its analysis of numerous examples.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

90%

Formal & Business

5%

Science

3%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

1%

Wiki

0.5%

Reference

0.5%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "that included" is a common and grammatically sound way to introduce specific items or examples that form part of a larger category, set, or action. As Ludwig AI confirms, it's widely used across various contexts, particularly in news and media. While generally versatile, it's best to avoid overusing it in situations where a simple listing with commas and "and" is more concise. Be mindful of restrictive vs. non-restrictive clause usage with "that" and "which", respectively. By following these guidelines, you can effectively and accurately use "that included" in your writing.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

that consisted of

Similar to "that comprised" but emphasizes the parts that make up the whole.

that comprised

Implies that the listed elements form the complete contents of something.

that incorporated

Highlights the act of integrating something into a whole or system.

which encompassed

Focuses on the scope of inclusion, emphasizing a broader range of elements.

which integrated

Emphasizes the process of bringing diverse elements into a unified system.

and also featured

Highlights specific elements as notable additions.

that took in

Suggests a process of absorbing or accepting elements.

this covered

Indicates the range or scope of a particular topic or area.

that took account of

Highlights considering and incorporating various factors.

and this embraced

Suggests the process of accepting a variety of different elements.

FAQs

How can I use "that included" in a sentence?

Use "that included" to introduce specific elements or examples within a larger category or action. For example, "The conference featured several workshops, that included sessions on AI and data analytics."

What are some alternatives to "that included"?

You can use alternatives such as "which encompassed", "that incorporated", or "that comprised" depending on the context.

Is there a difference between "that included" and "which included"?

Both "that included" and "which included" are grammatically correct, but "that" is typically used in restrictive clauses (essential to the sentence's meaning), while "which" is used in non-restrictive clauses (adds extra information). For example, "The report that included the data analysis was well-received" (essential) versus "The report, which included the data analysis, was well-received" (extra information).

When is it better to use a simple list instead of "that included"?

For simple enumerations, such as listing items in a set, a straightforward list using commas and "and" is generally clearer and more concise than using "that included". Instead of "The package that included pens, paper, and tape", prefer “The package included pens, paper and tape.