solid evidence for

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "solid evidence for" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing proof or support for a claim, theory, or argument in various contexts, such as academic writing or persuasive essays. Example: "The researchers presented solid evidence for the effectiveness of the new treatment in their clinical trials."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Nobody has yet produced any solid evidence for this.

The Economist

But so far, researchers say, solid evidence for any single factor has not emerged.

The New York Times - Science

"At last we have good solid evidence for life over 3.4 billion years ago.

Independent

"The discovery gives good solid evidence for life over 3.4 billion years ago.

Independent

Scientists have found the first solid evidence for cosmic neutrinos, ghostly particles created in violent events in the far reaches of the universe.

The Guardian

It is a big step the board has taken and I hope they have solid evidence for taking the actions that they have taken.

The Guardian - Sport

In recent years, 30,000 people around the world have flocked to clinics offering the balloon treatment, despite the lack of solid evidence for it.

The New York Times - Health

That pair was touted as the first solid evidence for the spin-up theory.

Science Magazine

They provide convincing solid evidence for study of Tibetan wall paintings.

Heritage Science

But we've seen instances in which leaked EXIF becomes solid evidence for or against the existence of a phone.

TechCrunch

None of the trials on neuroprotective therapies for PD has yet provided solid evidence for neuroprotection.

Parkinsonism & Related Disorders

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "solid evidence for" when you want to emphasize that the evidence is strong, reliable, and convincing. This phrase is particularly useful in academic, scientific, or legal contexts where the quality of evidence is crucial.

Common error

Avoid using "solid evidence for" if the evidence is preliminary, circumstantial, or based on limited data. Overstating the strength of evidence can undermine your credibility.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "solid evidence for" functions as an adjective phrase modifying the noun "evidence". It highlights the quality and reliability of the evidence being presented. As Ludwig AI confirms, this phrase is correct and usable in written English.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

69%

News & Media

25%

Wiki

2%

Less common in

Formal & Business

1%

Encyclopedias

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "solid evidence for" is a grammatically correct and frequently used expression that conveys the presence of reliable and convincing support for a particular claim or argument. As Ludwig AI indicates, it is widely applicable across diverse contexts, particularly in science and news media. While various alternatives exist, such as "strong evidence for" or "compelling evidence for", "solid evidence for" emphasizes the robustness and trustworthiness of the evidence. When using this phrase, ensure the evidence is indeed strong and reliable to maintain credibility.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

solid proof for

Replaces "evidence" with "proof", implying a more conclusive form of support.

credible evidence for

Substitutes "solid" with "credible", focusing on the believability of the evidence.

powerful evidence for

Replaces "solid" with "powerful", emphasizing the strength and impact of the evidence.

reliable evidence for

Changes "solid" to "reliable", highlighting the dependability of the evidence.

sound evidence for

Replaces "solid" with "sound", focusing on the logical and rational basis of the evidence.

firm evidence for

Substitutes "solid" with "firm", indicating a strong and unshakeable foundation of evidence.

substantial evidence for

Replaces "solid" with "substantial", emphasizing the quantity and significance of the evidence.

concrete evidence for

Changes "solid" to "concrete", highlighting the tangible and specific nature of the evidence.

strong evidence for

Replaces "solid" with "strong", focusing on the persuasive power of the evidence.

definite evidence for

Substitutes "solid" with "definite", indicating clear and unambiguous evidence.

FAQs

How can I use "solid evidence for" in a sentence?

You can use "solid evidence for" to introduce information that supports a claim or theory. For example, "The study provides "solid evidence for" the effectiveness of the new drug".

What are some alternatives to "solid evidence for"?

Some alternatives include "strong evidence for", "compelling evidence for", or "substantial evidence for", depending on the nuance you want to convey.

Is there a difference between "solid evidence for" and "strong evidence for"?

While similar, "solid evidence for" often implies reliability and trustworthiness, whereas "strong evidence for" emphasizes the persuasive power of the evidence.

When is it appropriate to use "solid evidence for" in academic writing?

It's appropriate when you are presenting research findings that are well-supported by data and rigorous methodology, offering a convincing argument in support of your hypothesis.