substantial evidence for

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "substantial evidence for" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing proof or support for a claim, argument, or hypothesis in various contexts, such as academic writing, legal discussions, or scientific research. Example: "The researchers presented substantial evidence for the effectiveness of the new treatment in their clinical trials."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Encyclopedias

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

To the contrary, there is substantial evidence for the proposition that the White House sees the vote as purely advisory, i.e., meaningless.

The Guardian - Opinion

The first crops in eastern North America may be almost as old, but substantial evidence for crop use there begins between 5000 and 4000 bp.

Encyclopedia Britannica

There was substantial evidence for the null hypothesis (BF01 = 5.48).

Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications

There was again substantial evidence for the null hypothesis (BF01 = 5.33).

Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications

In this case alone there was substantial evidence for a near-hands advantage.

Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications

There is now substantial evidence for natural catalytic activity in source rocks.

Geochemical Transactions

There is also substantial evidence for the strong relationship between Cognitive Skills and labor market outcomes.

Large-scale Assessments in Education

Hence our phenomena are substantial evidence for the truth of theism" (Swinburne 1976, 290).

SEP

There is substantial evidence for toxicity and/or carcinogenicity upon inhalation of pure transition metals in fine particulate form.

Carbon

According to calculated Bayes factors, there was substantial evidence for the null with respect to the effect of hand position.

Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications

Additionally, the Bayes factor showed substantial evidence for the null (BF01 = 3.45), namely support for the Tyranny of Film hypothesis.

Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When presenting research findings, use "substantial evidence for" to highlight significant support for your hypothesis, ensuring that the evidence is clearly documented and credible.

Common error

Avoid using "substantial evidence for" when the support is based on preliminary or limited data. Reserve this phrase for situations where the evidence is robust and well-established to maintain credibility.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "substantial evidence for" functions as an adjective phrase modifying the noun "evidence", followed by the preposition "for". According to Ludwig, it indicates that there is a significant amount of proof or support available.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

75%

News & Media

15%

Encyclopedias

5%

Less common in

Formal & Business

2%

Reference

2%

Social Media

1%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "substantial evidence for" is a grammatically correct and frequently used expression that indicates a significant amount of proof or support for a claim. As confirmed by Ludwig, it's commonly found in formal and scientific contexts, implying a high degree of certainty and credibility. When using this phrase, ensure that the evidence is indeed robust and well-documented to maintain clarity and persuasiveness in your writing. Remember that alternatives such as "considerable proof of" or "significant support for" can add nuance to your expression.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

considerable proof of

Replaces "evidence" with "proof" and "substantial" with "considerable", slightly emphasizing the amount of confirmation.

significant support for

Substitutes "evidence" with "support" and "substantial" with "significant", highlighting the backing provided to a claim.

ample justification for

Uses "justification" instead of "evidence", focusing on the reasons behind a decision or belief, while maintaining the sense of strong support.

strong indication of

Replaces "evidence" with "indication" and "substantial" with "strong", suggesting a clear sign pointing towards something.

compelling grounds for

Utilizes "grounds" in place of "evidence", indicating a solid basis for an argument or action, while keeping the intensity high.

extensive data supporting

Emphasizes the presence of a large amount of data that validates a particular claim or hypothesis.

notable confirmation of

Uses "confirmation" instead of "evidence", while "notable" signifies a mentionable degree of the affirmation.

marked substantiation of

Replaces "evidence" with "substantiation" and "substantial" with "marked", focusing on the act of proving or verifying something.

material corroboration of

Substitutes "evidence" with "corroboration" and "substantial" with "material", stressing significant reinforcement with additional proof.

considerable validation of

Uses "validation" in place of "evidence", focusing on the confirmation of the accuracy or legitimacy of something, while maintaining the impact high.

FAQs

How can I use "substantial evidence for" in a sentence?

Use "substantial evidence for" when you want to indicate that there is a significant amount of proof or support for a particular claim or idea. For example: "The study provides "substantial evidence for" the effectiveness of the new drug".

What are some alternatives to "substantial evidence for"?

You can use alternatives like "considerable proof of", "significant support for", or "ample justification for" depending on the context.

Is it better to say "strong evidence for" or "substantial evidence for"?

Both "strong evidence for" and "substantial evidence for" are correct and usable. The best choice depends on the nuance you want to convey. "Substantial" emphasizes the amount of evidence, while "strong" emphasizes its impact.

What kind of evidence qualifies as "substantial evidence for" something?

"Substantial evidence for" implies that the evidence is not only present but also convincing and significant enough to support a claim. It suggests a level of reliability and credibility that goes beyond mere speculation or weak indicators.