strong evidence for

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "strong evidence for" is grammatically correct and commonly used in written English.
It is typically used when stating that something provides proof or support for a certain claim or belief. For example: - "The DNA analysis provided strong evidence for the suspect's guilt." - "The results of the study serve as strong evidence for the effectiveness of this new medication." - "Her extensive research provides strong evidence for the theory that climate change is caused by human activity."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Academia

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

I don't know of strong evidence for that claim".

The New Yorker

Our results provide strong evidence for a gateway belief model.

Yale University

All, these results provide strong evidence for clinical therapeutic benefits.

Nature

Prior research has provided strong evidence for spatial numerical associations.

Acta Psychologica

The study is clearly not strong evidence for ADHD being a genetic disease.

The Guardian - Opinion

There is already strong evidence for diesel pollutants having an effect on cognitive function in kids.

The Guardian

"But it's the first strong evidence for Helike that is consistent with descriptions in ancient accounts".

The New York Times - Science

We find strong evidence for its existence in all ten statistical categories we consider.

Stanford University

They provide strong evidence for an explanation of human thinking in terms of basic information processes.

Yale University

In some previous cases strong evidence for this connection was not found.

Harvard University

Some say the results are strong evidence for not adding niacin to statin therapy.

Harvard University

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "strong evidence for", clearly specify what the evidence supports to avoid ambiguity. For example, instead of saying "there is strong evidence", state "there is strong evidence for the effectiveness of this treatment".

Common error

Avoid using "strong evidence for" when the evidence is only suggestive or preliminary. Using qualifiers like "suggestive evidence" or "preliminary evidence" is more accurate when the evidence is not conclusive.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "strong evidence for" functions as a declarative statement, asserting the existence of significant support for a particular claim or hypothesis. Ludwig's examples demonstrate its use in academic, scientific, and news contexts to emphasize the reliability of findings.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

68%

News & Media

19%

Academia

12%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

0.7%

Wiki

0.3%

Formal & Business

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "strong evidence for" is a grammatically sound and frequently employed phrase used to assert the presence of substantial support for a claim. As Ludwig AI confirms, its use is common across diverse fields like science, news, and academia. While alternatives like "compelling evidence for" and "substantial evidence for" exist, it's essential to avoid overstating the strength of the evidence. Using "strong evidence for" effectively involves clearly specifying what the evidence supports, ensuring accuracy and credibility in your communication.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

compelling evidence for

Replaces "strong" with "compelling", suggesting the evidence is persuasive and convincing.

substantial evidence for

Substitutes "strong" with "substantial", emphasizing the significant amount of evidence available.

convincing evidence for

Replaces "strong" with "convincing", indicating the evidence is capable of persuading someone.

definitive proof of

Replaces "evidence" with "proof", suggesting a conclusive demonstration of something.

irrefutable evidence for

Substitutes "strong" with "irrefutable", meaning the evidence cannot be argued against.

solid basis for

Offers a different structure, focusing on the foundational support provided by the evidence.

firm foundation for

Similar to "solid basis", emphasizing the stability and reliability of the supporting evidence.

powerful indication of

Replaces "evidence" with "indication", suggesting a strong sign or signal.

clear support for

Uses "clear" to describe the support provided by the evidence, emphasizing its transparency and understandability.

ample justification for

Replaces "evidence" with "justification", focusing on the reasons or grounds for something.

FAQs

How can I use "strong evidence for" in a sentence?

Use "strong evidence for" to highlight compelling proof or support for a particular claim or idea. For instance, "The research provides "strong evidence for" the link between diet and health outcomes".

What are some alternatives to "strong evidence for"?

Alternatives include "compelling evidence for", "substantial evidence for", or "convincing evidence for". The choice depends on the specific nuance you want to convey.

Is "strong evidence for" the same as "proof of"?

While both phrases indicate support, ""strong evidence for"" suggests a high degree of support, while "proof of" implies conclusive and undeniable validation. Therefore, "proof of" is a stronger statement.

When should I use "strong evidence for" versus "some evidence for"?

Use ""strong evidence for"" when the support is substantial and convincing. Use "some evidence for" when the support is preliminary or suggestive but not yet conclusive.