saturated with

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "saturated with" is correct and commonly used in written English.
It is used to describe something that is filled or covered, usually with something else. Example: The air was saturated with the smell of smoke.

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

57 human-written examples

Everything was colorful, saturated with tropical light.

The New Yorker

"This whole book is saturated with history.

The New Yorker

It is nearly saturated with employment opportunities.

The Economist

We city dwellers are saturated with testimonials.

The New Yorker

His genes are saturated with the sport.

Independent

"It's lightweight, saturated with color.

The New York Times

The nation is saturated with violence.

The New York Times

The design is saturated with it.

The New York Times - Arts

"I was saturated with music constantly.

The New York Times

Waters's sixth novel is saturated with uneasiness.

The New Yorker

The plate-licked gazpacho is saturated with Spanish holidays.

The Guardian - Lifestyle

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "saturated with" when you want to emphasize that something is completely filled or permeated with something else, often to the point where no more can be absorbed or contained. This phrase adds a sense of intensity or thoroughness.

Common error

While "saturated with" is a valid and useful phrase, avoid using it excessively in informal writing or conversation. Simpler alternatives like "full of" or "filled with" may be more appropriate and natural in those settings.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "saturated with" functions as a modifier, specifically an adjective phrase with a preposition. It describes a noun by indicating that it is completely filled or permeated by something. Ludwig confirms its correct usage in various contexts.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

48%

Science

34%

Formal & Business

9%

Less common in

Wiki

5%

Encyclopedias

2%

Academia

2%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "saturated with" is a grammatically sound and versatile expression used to describe something thoroughly filled or permeated. Ludwig AI confirms its correct usage across diverse contexts, particularly in News & Media and Science. While "saturated with" is widely accepted, remember to consider simpler alternatives like "filled with" in more informal settings. Pay attention to the nuances of similar phrases like "imbued with" and "drenched in" to fine-tune your message. The phrase's high frequency and presence in authoritative sources underscore its reliability and effectiveness in written English.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

filled with

A more general term indicating that something contains a large quantity of something else.

drenched in

Implies being thoroughly soaked or covered with a liquid or quality.

permeated by

Focuses on the idea of something being diffused or spread throughout something else.

inundated with

Similar to 'awash in', but emphasizes the overwhelming quantity or influx of something.

imbued with

Suggests that something is deeply influenced or characterized by a particular quality.

steeped in

Suggests being immersed or deeply involved in something, often a tradition or culture.

suffused with

Implies that something is gradually spread or filled throughout something else.

laden with

Indicates being heavily burdened or filled with something, often something tangible.

replete with

Highlights the idea of being abundantly supplied or filled to satisfaction.

awash in

Suggests being covered or flooded with something, often in an overwhelming manner.

FAQs

How can I use "saturated with" in a sentence?

The phrase "saturated with" is used to describe something that is completely filled or permeated with something else. For example, "The air was saturated with the smell of smoke."

What can I say instead of "saturated with"?

You can use alternatives like "filled with", "permeated by", or "drenched in" depending on the specific nuance you want to convey.

Is it better to say "saturated with" or "full of"?

"Saturated with" implies a more thorough or intense filling than "full of". Choose "saturated with" when you want to emphasize the completeness of the filling or permeation, while "full of" is generally suitable for more general contexts.

What is the difference between "saturated with" and "imbued with"?

"Saturated with" suggests a state of being completely filled, while "imbued with" suggests that something has been deeply influenced or characterized by a particular quality or feeling. The former is about quantity, the latter about influence.