filled with

USAGE SUMMARY

"filled with" is correct and can be used in written English.
You can use it to describe something that is full of a certain thing. For example: "The room was filled with laughter."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Streets filled with sand.

The New York Times

Filled with Lauder's 'Beautiful'.

Independent

Filled with emotion.

The New York Times

He's filled with humility.

The New York Times

"His chest filled with anger".

The New York Times

The tent filled with applause.

The New York Times - Sports

It is filled with Ducks".

The New York Times

"I am filled with hope.

Independent

It was filled with rainwater.

The New Yorker

He is filled with revulsion.

The New Yorker

The room filled with snow.

The New Yorker

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "filled with" to vividly describe spaces, objects, or emotions that are abundant with specific contents or qualities. For example, "The garden was filled with colorful flowers" paints a more engaging picture than "The garden had flowers."

Common error

Avoid consistently using "filled with" in passive voice constructions (e.g., "The room was filled with smoke"). Occasionally, rephrase to active voice (e.g., "Smoke filled the room") for more direct and impactful writing.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "filled with" primarily functions as a descriptive adjective phrase, modifying a noun to indicate that it contains a significant amount of something. Ludwig examples show it describing both physical spaces (e.g., "Streets filled with sand") and abstract states (e.g., "Filled with emotion").

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

46%

Science

28%

Wiki

6%

Less common in

Formal & Business

4%

Encyclopedias

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "filled with" is a grammatically sound and versatile phrase used to describe abundance or saturation. Ludwig AI confirms its correctness and broad applicability. Predominantly found in News & Media and Scientific contexts, it maintains a neutral register suitable for diverse writing styles. Its function is to vividly depict something containing a substantial amount of a specific element or quality. When using "filled with", consider opting for active voice to enhance writing impact. The examples available through Ludwig showcase the wide range of applications for this useful phrase.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

replete with

Indicates a state of being completely filled, often to the point of overflowing, suggesting a rich or abundant presence.

overflowing with

Emphasizes the abundance and excess, suggesting that something is so full it is spilling over.

brimming with

Suggests being full to the top, on the verge of overflowing, highlighting a sense of anticipation or excitement.

saturated with

Implies a thorough permeation or impregnation, often used for liquids or emotions.

teeming with

Suggests a great abundance of living things or activity, indicating a lively and crowded environment.

abounding in

Highlights the presence of something in great quantity, suggesting richness and plentifulness.

laden with

Implies being heavily burdened or weighed down, often with something valuable or significant.

awash with

Suggests being covered or flooded, often used for emotions or abstract qualities.

flush with

Indicates having a plentiful supply, often used in the context of resources or money.

imbued with

Suggests being permeated or infused with a quality or characteristic, often used for abstract concepts.

FAQs

How can I use "filled with" in a sentence?

Use "filled with" to describe something that is full of a particular thing or quality. For example, "The auditorium was filled with enthusiastic students" or "Her heart was filled with joy".

What are some alternatives to "filled with"?

Alternatives include "replete with", "overflowing with", "brimming with", or "saturated with", depending on the specific context and nuance you want to convey.

Is it better to say "filled with" or "full of"?

Both "filled with" and "full of" are grammatically correct and often interchangeable. However, "filled with" can sometimes suggest a more active process or a greater degree of saturation. The choice depends on the specific context and desired emphasis.

What's the difference between "filled with" and "covered in"?

"Filled with" implies that something is inside and occupying the space of something else, while "covered in" suggests something is on the surface of something else. For example, "The box was filled with toys" versus "The table was covered in dust".