Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.
Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
responded to with
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "responded to with" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when describing how someone reacted to a particular action or statement, indicating the response given. Example: "The proposal was met with skepticism and responded to with a detailed explanation of its benefits."
✓ Grammatically correct
News & Media
Science
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
58 human-written examples
"Their work will be responded to with more hostility, open to more scrutiny.
News & Media
Guardian Australia's requests for further clarification were responded to with the same statement.
News & Media
Not ever". It's a remark his soldiers would have responded to with rude sounds.
News & Media
But it's not this superficial wildness that Eliasson has responded to with his Turner Colour Experiments.
News & Media
Such moves will never hide that great crime, criticism should not be responded to with beheading".
News & Media
While final rise formulations are used to solicit elaborate confirmations, rise fall confirmations are responded to with mere confirmation.
Science
Like Fleetwood Mac, the Clintons were a brilliantly packaged product that the public responded to with enthusiasm.
News & Media
Group 2: DISASTER RELIEF -What recent disasters has the International Red Cross responded to with aid and assistance?
News & Media
The urgent need for innovation to address multifaceted and intertwined water-related challenges is becoming increasingly clear, acknowledged and responded to with cumulating sources and amounts of funding.
Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources
Similar Expressions
2 human-written examples
Patient responded to treatment with antibiotics.
Science
All patients responded to treatment with methylprednisolone, azithioprine +/- rituximab.
Academia
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
When describing how an organization has "responded to with" an action, make sure the action is well-defined and the response is measurable.
Common error
Avoid overuse of the passive voice when using "responded to with". Ensure it's clear who or what is responding. For example, instead of "The email was responded to with silence", specify "The team responded to the email with silence" for better clarity.
Source & Trust
83%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "responded to with" functions as a verb phrase indicating the manner or means by which someone or something reacted to a particular stimulus. As Ludwig AI highlights, the phrase is grammatically sound and widely accepted in English writing.
Frequent in
News & Media
47%
Science
43%
Formal & Business
5%
Less common in
Encyclopedias
0%
Wiki
3%
Reference
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
In summary, "responded to with" is a versatile and grammatically correct phrase used to describe how someone or something reacted to a specific stimulus. As shown by Ludwig AI, the phrase is widely accepted. It is frequently found in News & Media and Scientific contexts, indicating its appropriateness for neutral and informative writing. When using "responded to with", ensure clarity by specifying the subject and nature of the response and avoid overuse of the passive voice. Alternatives include "answered with" and "replied with", depending on the desired nuance.
More alternative expressions(6)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
answered with
Focuses on providing a direct answer or reply.
replied with
Highlights the act of making a reply, emphasizing the verbal response.
reacted with
Emphasizes the emotional or behavioral response to a stimulus.
countered with
Indicates a response that opposes or challenges a previous action or statement.
acknowledged with
Focuses on recognizing or accepting something, often followed by a specific action.
met with
Describes the reception or reaction something receives.
addressed with
Highlights the act of dealing with or focusing on a specific issue or question.
retorted with
Suggests a sharp or witty reply, often in response to criticism or an accusation.
came back with
Indicates a return response or action, often after a delay or period of consideration.
defended with
Emphasizes a defensive response, often involving arguments or actions to protect something.
FAQs
How can I use "responded to with" in a sentence?
The phrase "responded to with" is used to show a reaction to something. For example, "The company "responded to with" a press release after the allegations surfaced".
What are some alternatives to "responded to with"?
Alternatives include "answered with", "replied with", or "reacted with". The best choice depends on the specific context and the nuance you want to convey.
Is "responded to with" formal or informal?
"Responded to with" is suitable for both formal and informal contexts, though it appears more frequently in news and professional settings. The level of formality depends more on the surrounding vocabulary than on the phrase itself.
Which is correct, "responded to with" or "responded with"?
Both "responded to with" and "responded with" are grammatically correct, but they carry slightly different meanings. "Responded to with" emphasizes the manner or means of response, while "responded with" simply indicates that a response was given.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
83%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested