Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.
Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
responded with
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
"responded with" is correct and commonly used in written English.
It is typically used when describing how someone reacted or replied to something. For example: - The teacher asked a challenging question, and the student responded with a well-thought-out answer. - After receiving the news, she responded with tears and a hug for her friend. - In response to the criticism, the company's CEO responded with a public statement defending their actions.
✓ Grammatically correct
News & Media
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
60 human-written examples
He responded with defiance.
News & Media
Southerners responded with outrage.
News & Media
Carr responded with fury.
News & Media
Others responded with anger.
News & Media
Labor officials responded with anger.
News & Media
Jane responded with evasive enthusiasm.
News & Media
Mr. Broun responded with outrage.
News & Media
Londoners responded with extraordinary unity.
News & Media
The Israelis responded with ferocity.
News & Media
He responded with typical surefootedness.
News & Media
We responded with live fire".
News & Media
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
Use "responded with" to clearly indicate a reaction or reply to a specific prompt or situation. This phrase works well in formal and informal contexts.
Common error
Avoid using "responded with" when a simple "said" or "stated" would suffice. "Responded with" implies a direct reaction or answer to something, so ensure that context is present.
Source & Trust
88%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "responded with" functions as a verb phrase indicating a reaction or answer to a stimulus. As demonstrated by Ludwig's examples, it connects an action or statement to a previous prompt, question, or situation. It typically precedes a noun or noun phrase describing the form of the response.
Frequent in
News & Media
95%
Formal & Business
3%
Encyclopedias
1%
Less common in
Science
0.5%
Wiki
0.25%
Reference
0.25%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
In summary, "responded with" is a versatile and grammatically sound phrase used to describe how someone or something reacted to a situation. Ludwig AI confirms its correctness and common usage, especially in News & Media. While alternatives like "replied with" or "reacted with" exist, "responded with" effectively conveys the connection between a stimulus and a response. Be mindful of using it when a simpler verb like "said" would suffice. Understanding these nuances helps ensure precise and impactful writing.
More alternative expressions(6)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
replied with
Indicates a direct verbal response; more focused on the content of the answer.
reacted with
Emphasizes the emotional or behavioral response to a stimulus.
answered with
Implies a straightforward response, often to a question.
countered with
Suggests a response that opposes or challenges a previous statement or action.
retorted with
Implies a sharp or witty response, often in retaliation.
came back with
Suggests a quick or clever response.
shot back with
Implies a rapid and often defensive verbal response.
offered
Focuses on giving a response, suggestion, or item.
stated
Neutral way to say something in an official manner
expressed
Highlights the conveying of feelings or thoughts.
FAQs
How can I use "responded with" in a sentence?
"Responded with" indicates a reaction or reply to something. For example, "The company "responded with" a public statement after the allegations were made."
What are some alternatives to "responded with"?
Depending on the context, you could use alternatives like "replied with", "reacted with", or "answered with".
Is it more appropriate to use "responded with" or "replied with"?
"Responded with" implies a broader reaction, while "replied with" suggests a more direct, verbal answer. Choose based on whether you're emphasizing the action or the specific words spoken.
Can "responded with" be used in both formal and informal writing?
Yes, "responded with" is appropriate for both formal and informal writing. However, consider the tone and context. In very informal settings, simpler words like "said" might be preferable.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
88%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested