Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.
Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
replied with
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
"replied with" is an acceptable and usable part of a sentence in written English.
Example sentence: She replied with a warm welcome.
✓ Grammatically correct
News & Media
Encyclopedias
Wiki
Alternative expressions(4)
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
60 human-written examples
Monroe replied with typical eloquence.
News & Media
The bookseller replied with boilerplate.
News & Media
"Five!" he replied with exasperation.
News & Media
He replied with a laugh.
News & Media
"My hero," Baldwin replied, with a sigh.
News & Media
"Younger," she replied, with a sharp smile.
News & Media
Busacca replied with a red card.
News & Media
"Oh no," he replied with a laugh.
News & Media
"No," he replied with a laugh.
News & Media
Hundreds replied with a mix of responses.
News & Media
He replied with a single word: "Soppy".
News & Media
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
Use "replied with" to clearly indicate a direct response to a question or statement. It's particularly effective when you want to emphasize the specific content or manner of the response.
Common error
Avoid using "replied back with" as it is redundant. "Replied" already implies a response, so adding "back" is unnecessary.
Source & Trust
88%
Authority and reliability
4.6/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "replied with" primarily functions as a verbal phrase indicating a direct response to a question, statement, or situation. As Ludwig AI confirms, it is grammatically sound and widely accepted in English writing. Examples show it specifying the manner or content of the response.
Frequent in
News & Media
50%
Encyclopedias
17%
Wiki
8%
Less common in
Formal & Business
8%
Science
8%
Reference
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
The phrase "replied with" is a common and grammatically sound way to indicate a direct response, as confirmed by Ludwig AI. Its strength lies in clearly specifying the content or manner of the response. Found predominantly in news, encyclopedic, and general contexts, it maintains a neutral register suitable for diverse writing styles. When using "replied with", avoid the redundant "replied back with". Alternatives include "responded with", "answered with", or "stated", each offering slightly different nuances. As evidenced by Ludwig's extensive collection of examples, mastering the use of "replied with" is essential for clear and effective communication.
More alternative expressions(10)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
responded with
This alternative is a direct synonym, offering a similar level of formality and impact.
answered with
This alternative is more general and may imply a more direct or simple response.
retorted with
This alternative suggests a sharp, defensive, or witty response.
came back with
This alternative is more informal and suggests a quick or immediate response.
shot back with
This alternative emphasizes the speed and forcefulness of the reply.
rejoined with
This alternative implies a return to a conversation or argument.
countered with
This alternative suggests an opposition or defense in an argument or debate.
remarked with
This alternative indicates a more casual or observational response.
stated with
This alternative suggests a formal or declarative response.
intoned
This alternative shifts the focus to the manner of speaking rather than the content of the reply.
FAQs
How can I use "replied with" in a sentence?
Use "replied with" to show a direct response. For instance, "When asked about the project, she replied with enthusiasm".
What are some alternatives to "replied with"?
You can use alternatives such as "responded with", "answered with", or "stated" depending on the context.
Is it correct to say "replied back with"?
No, "replied back with" is considered redundant. The word "replied" already implies a return response, making "back" unnecessary. Use "replied with" instead.
How does "replied with" differ from "said"?
"Replied with" indicates a direct answer or response to something, while "said" is a more general term for speaking. "Replied with" is more specific to answering a question or comment.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
88%
Authority and reliability
4.6/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested