repercussions for

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "repercussions for" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it to refer to the consequences of an action. For example, "The government is facing serious repercussions for its mishandling of the pandemic."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

59 human-written examples

The repercussions for American intervention are stark.

The New York Times

The strike had dire repercussions for Yemen's economy.

The New York Times

That could have repercussions for the finances of royal regeneration.

The New York Times

His fate could have broad repercussions for Hezbollah.

The New York Times

And what will be the repercussions for size zero?

Independent

The case could have repercussions for other video streaming services.

The New York Times

The changes may have deep repercussions for the United States.

The New York Times

"It might have repercussions for me, who knows?" Allardyce said.

Independent

Their findings could have important repercussions for drug development.

The New Yorker

The issue has wide repercussions for an ailing housing market.

The New York Times

But it may also have national repercussions for the Republicans.

The Economist

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "repercussions for" when you want to emphasize the broad and often indirect consequences of an action or decision on a specific entity or group.

Common error

Avoid using "repercussions" interchangeably with "consequences" without considering the scale. "Consequences" often refer to direct and immediate outcomes, while "repercussions" suggest wider, longer-term effects.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "repercussions for" functions as a prepositional phrase, typically modifying a verb or noun to indicate the consequences or effects resulting from an action or situation. As supported by Ludwig, this phrase is grammatically correct and widely used.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

42%

Science

32%

Formal & Business

10%

Less common in

Wiki

7%

Reference

5%

Encyclopedias

4%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "repercussions for" is a grammatically correct and very common prepositional phrase used to indicate the consequences or effects of an action, decision, or event on a specific entity or group. As Ludwig AI explains, it's suitable for various contexts, with a more frequent occurrence in News & Media and Scientific sources. While often carrying a negative connotation, it is important to use "repercussions for" when the effects are significant and potentially far-reaching, distinguishing it from similar phrases like "consequences of" or "implications of". Remember to consider the scale and scope of the outcomes when choosing this phrase in your writing.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

consequences of

Focuses specifically on the outcome or result of an action, often implying a direct cause-and-effect relationship.

implications of

Highlights the potential future effects or broader impact that something may have.

effects on

Emphasizes the direct influence or impact on something, whether positive or negative.

impact on

Similar to "effects on", but can also imply a more significant or powerful influence.

ramifications of

Suggests a complex set of consequences that spread out from an initial action.

outcomes for

Directly relates to the result or end product, particularly in situations involving decisions or actions.

aftermath of

Focuses on the period following an event and the resulting conditions or consequences.

fallout from

Implies negative consequences or secondary effects resulting from an event.

upshot of

Indicates the final or eventual result, often after a series of events or actions.

price to pay for

Highlights the negative consequences or sacrifices required as a result of a particular action or decision.

FAQs

How can I use "repercussions for" in a sentence?

You can use "repercussions for" to indicate the consequences or effects of something on a specific entity or group. For example, "The new policy will have serious "repercussions for" small businesses".

What are some alternatives to "repercussions for"?

Alternatives include "consequences of", "implications of", or "effects on", depending on the specific nuance you wish to convey.

Is there a difference between "repercussions for" and "implications for"?

"Repercussions for" often suggests a more negative or problematic outcome, while "implications for" is more neutral and can refer to both positive and negative effects.

When is it appropriate to use "repercussions for" in formal writing?

The phrase "repercussions for" is appropriate in formal writing when discussing the potentially far-reaching or significant effects of an action, policy, or event. Be mindful of the potentially negative connotation and use it when a more neutral term like "implications for" might not fully capture the gravity of the situation.