consequences of

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "consequences of" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to discuss the results or effects that follow from a particular action, event, or situation. Example: "The consequences of climate change are becoming increasingly evident in our daily lives."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Wiki

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

"Those are consequences of loneliness.

The Guardian - Lifestyle

The consequences of grief.

The New Yorker

Now, consequences, of course.

The New Yorker

The consequences of that, however, remained unclear.

The New York Times

The consequences of these differences are huge.

The New York Times

Hauer knew the consequences of winter.

The New Yorker

The consequences of failure, though, are serious.

The Economist

The consequences of continued inaction are dire.

The New York Times

The numbers have consequences, of course.

The New York Times

Yemen has witnessed the consequences of this.

Independent

"The consequences of this terrify me".

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When discussing the "consequences of" an action, be specific and provide evidence or examples to support your claims. Clearly articulate the link between the action and its results.

Common error

Avoid exaggerating the "consequences of" an event or action. Ensure that the stated outcomes are realistic and proportional to the initial cause.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "consequences of" functions as a noun modifier, introducing the results or effects that stem from a specific action, event, or condition. As Ludwig AI confirms, this phrase is grammatically sound and widely applicable. It sets the stage for discussing outcomes, whether positive or negative.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

39%

Science

23%

Wiki

19%

Less common in

Formal & Business

8%

Encyclopedias

8%

Reference

3%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "consequences of" is a grammatically correct and versatile tool for expressing cause-and-effect relationships. As Ludwig AI confirms, it's widely used in various contexts, from news and media to scientific research and general discussions. Its neutral register makes it suitable for both formal and informal communication. When using "consequences of", clarity and specificity are key to effectively conveying the link between actions and their outcomes. Be mindful of potential overstatements and consider alternative phrases like "results of" or "implications of" to add nuance to your writing.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

results of

Emphasizes the direct outcomes or effects stemming from a particular cause or action.

effects of

Focuses on the impact or influence resulting from a specific event or situation.

outcomes of

Highlights the final results or conclusions derived from a process or action.

repercussions of

Indicates the far-reaching and often negative effects following an event or decision.

implications of

Stresses the potential future impacts and significance associated with a particular action or situation.

aftermath of

Focuses on the period and the resulting effects immediately following a significant event, often negative.

upshot of

Refers to the final and decisive result or conclusion of a series of events or actions.

sequelae of

Specifically denotes the long-term consequences or conditions resulting from a disease or injury.

wake of

Describes the events and effects that follow closely behind a significant occurrence, similar to a ship's wake.

product of

Indicates that something is directly created or caused by a specific factor or process.

FAQs

How do I use "consequences of" in a sentence?

The phrase "consequences of" is used to describe the results or effects that follow a particular action or event. For example, "The "consequences of climate change" are becoming increasingly evident."

What are some alternatives to "consequences of"?

You can use alternatives such as "results of", "effects of", or "implications of" depending on the context.

Is it better to use "consequences of" or "impact of"?

Both "consequences of" and "impact of" are valid, but "consequences of" often implies a more direct or inevitable result, while "impact of" can refer to a broader influence or effect.

What are the typical "consequences of" inaction?

The "consequences of" inaction can range from missed opportunities to severe repercussions. It depends on the specific situation but often includes negative outcomes that could have been avoided with timely action.