implications for

USAGE SUMMARY

"implications for" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when you want to refer to the practical consequences of an action or situation. For example, "The current situation has serious implications for the future of the company."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

And the implications for privacy?

The Guardian - Tech

That has implications for privacy and commerce.

The New York Times - Tech

His injury has implications for several teams.

The New York Times - Sports

Consider the implications for societal health.

The New York Times

That has ominous implications for investors.

The New York Times

This has enormous implications for the forecast.

Independent

Targeted advertising bears important implications for consumers.

The New York Times - Tech

It also has implications for American politics.

The New York Times

The implications for Mr Berlusconi are serious.

The Economist

This has implications for relations with Russia.

The Economist

This has clear implications for development policy.

The Economist

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "implications for", ensure you clearly articulate what is being affected. Specificity enhances clarity and strengthens your argument.

Common error

Avoid exaggerating the significance of the "implications for". Ensure your claims are supported by evidence and logical reasoning to maintain credibility.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "implications for" functions as a prepositional phrase that introduces the entity or area affected by a particular action, event, or decision. Ludwig AI confirms its widespread use. It serves to highlight the potential consequences or effects on that entity.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

43%

Science

37%

Formal & Business

20%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "implications for" is a versatile prepositional phrase used to discuss the potential consequences or effects of a particular situation or decision. Ludwig AI validates its widespread use in varied contexts, from news and media to science and formal business settings. When using "implications for", ensure that you clearly articulate the subject being affected to enhance clarity. Be mindful of overstating claims, and ensure they're backed by sound reasoning. Consider alternative phrases like "consequences of" or "effects on" to finely tune your message.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

consequences of

This alternative focuses on the direct results or outcomes of a particular action or event, emphasizing the chain of cause and effect.

effects on

This phrase highlights the impact or influence that something has on a specific entity or area.

impact on

This term emphasizes the forceful or significant influence that something exerts.

ramifications for

This suggests a more complex and far-reaching set of consequences.

bearing on

This indicates a relevance or influence on a particular matter or situation.

repercussions for

This term emphasizes the after-effects or indirect consequences of an action.

significance of

This phrase highlights the importance or relevance of something in relation to something else.

importance to

This alternative underscores the value or necessity of something to a particular entity or outcome.

relevance to

This term indicates the degree to which something is related or applicable to a specific context.

influence on

This highlights the power to affect or shape something.

FAQs

How do I use "implications for" in a sentence?

The phrase "implications for" is used to discuss the potential effects or consequences of a particular situation or decision. For example, "The new policy has significant "implications for" small businesses."

What can I say instead of "implications for"?

You can use alternatives like "consequences of", "effects on", or "impact on" depending on the specific context.

How does "implications for" differ from "effects on"?

"Implications for" typically refers to potential or indirect consequences, while "effects on" usually describes direct and observable results. For instance, a policy's "implications for" the economy might include long-term shifts in investment, whereas the "effects on" the economy are immediately measurable changes in GDP.

Is it better to use "implications for" or "consequences of"?

The choice between "implications for" and "consequences of" depends on the context. "Implications for" is suitable when discussing broader, often less direct, effects, while "consequences of" is more appropriate for immediate and direct results. Consider, "The consequences of failing the exam are immediate: you cannot graduate." versus "The study has implications for future research in the field."