qualifications for

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase 'qualifications for' is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when talking about qualifications required for a particular job or activity. For example: "The qualifications for this position include a degree in computer science and five years of experience in software engineering."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

58 human-written examples

The F.A.A. soon set qualifications for balloonists.

The New York Times - Health

The qualifications for this are pretty straightforward.

The New York Times

"The qualifications for entry have gone up".

The New York Times

Tells about the qualifications for a "save".

The New Yorker

Bring back property qualifications for voting!

The New York Times

There are also income qualifications for buyers.

The New York Times

Note first their qualifications for this task.

The Guardian

He had, however, unique qualifications for the Afghanistan post.

The New York Times

Mr. Drewniak also defended Ms. Brown's qualifications for the job.

The New York Times

"She exceeded the qualifications for tenure," Mr. Anderson said.

The New York Times

Less apparent are any qualifications for the job.

The Economist

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When listing "qualifications for" a role or position, be specific and quantify requirements whenever possible (e.g., "5+ years of experience" instead of "experience").

Common error

Avoid generic statements like "good communication skills" when describing "qualifications for" a job. Instead, provide examples of how these skills will be used and why they are essential for success in the role.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "qualifications for" acts as a noun phrase functioning to specify the requirements, criteria, or attributes necessary for a particular role, position, or activity. Ludwig confirms its grammatical correctness and wide applicability.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

45%

Science

20%

Formal & Business

15%

Less common in

Wiki

10%

Academia

5%

Reference

5%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "qualifications for" is a common and grammatically sound expression used to specify the necessary attributes, skills, or criteria needed for a particular role or purpose. As confirmed by Ludwig, it is widely used across various contexts, particularly in news, science, and formal business settings. When using this phrase, specificity and quantifiable requirements are key to avoiding vagueness. Alternatives like ""requirements for"", "criteria for", and "prerequisites for" can be employed to add nuance to your writing. Remember to provide concrete examples and clearly define why each qualification is essential.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

criteria for

Changes the noun to 'criteria', emphasizing specific standards or benchmarks.

requirements for

Replaces 'qualifications' with 'requirements', focusing on mandatory conditions.

prerequisites for

Substitutes 'qualifications' with 'prerequisites', highlighting necessary preconditions.

eligibility for

Uses 'eligibility' instead of 'qualifications', stressing the state of being qualified.

conditions for

Employs 'conditions' to denote the necessary terms or stipulations.

standards for

Replaces the term with 'standards' which are established norms or benchmarks.

demands for

Changes the word to 'demands' which emphasizes the requirements asked or needed.

essential attributes for

Expands the phrase to include 'essential attributes', emphasizing key characteristics.

desired traits for

Replaces 'qualifications' with 'desired traits', focusing on preferred characteristics.

necessary skills for

Substitutes qualifications to 'necessary skills', highlighting specific abilities required.

FAQs

How do I use "qualifications for" in a sentence?

Use "qualifications for" to specify the necessary skills, experience, or education needed for a particular role or activity. For example, "What are the "requirements for" this position?" or "The "eligibility for" the scholarship include academic excellence and community involvement."

What are some alternatives to "qualifications for"?

You can use alternatives such as "criteria for", ""requirements for"", or "prerequisites for" depending on the specific context and the nuance you want to convey.

Which is correct, "qualifications for" or "qualifications to"?

"Qualifications for" is generally used to specify what is needed to be eligible or suitable for something, while "qualifications to" is less common. It's usually better to use alternatives such as "qualified to".

What's the difference between "qualifications for" and "experience in"?

"Qualifications for" generally refer to the formal requirements or criteria needed, such as degrees or certifications. "Experience in", on the other hand, refers to practical knowledge or skills gained through involvement in a particular field or activity.