criteria for

USAGE SUMMARY

"criteria for" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it to describe an established set of standards or rules that are used to evaluate something. For example, "We established criteria for selecting the winner of the competition."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

59 human-written examples

"There are criteria for records".

The New York Times - Sports

His criteria for what works?

The New York Times

There are three criteria for the designs.

The New York Times

Nor are there official criteria for membership.

The New York Times

The criteria for promotion are opaque.

The New York Times

No criteria for eligibility are specified.

The Economist

With that comes agreed criteria for inspection.

The Guardian - Opinion

Equally absorbing are the criteria for attractiveness.

The Guardian - Books

What are the criteria for public art?

The New York Times

There were three criteria for each route.

The Guardian

He blames the strict criteria for applicants.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "criteria for", ensure that the criteria are clearly defined and relevant to the subject being evaluated. Be specific and avoid ambiguity.

Common error

Avoid using "criteria for" without specifying what those criteria are. Always provide a clear and detailed explanation of the standards or rules being applied.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "criteria for" functions as a prepositional phrase that typically modifies a noun, specifying the standards or requirements that are used to make a judgment or evaluation. As Ludwig AI confirms, it's commonly used in diverse contexts.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

35%

Science

30%

Formal & Business

15%

Less common in

Wiki

10%

Reference

5%

Encyclopedias

5%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "criteria for" is a versatile prepositional phrase used to denote the standards or requirements for something. According to Ludwig AI, the phrase is grammatically sound and widely accepted in written English. It’s commonly used across various contexts, including news, science, and formal business settings. When writing, ensure the criteria are well-defined and avoid ambiguity to maintain clarity. Alternatives such as "requirements for" or "standards for" can be used depending on the specific nuance you wish to convey. Remember to avoid vagueness by specifying what those criteria are.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

standards for

This refers to benchmarks or levels of quality that are expected.

guidelines for

This suggests recommended practices or procedures.

requirements to

This focuses on mandatory conditions that must be met.

conditions for

This refers to the circumstances necessary for something to occur.

qualifications for

This emphasizes the necessary skills or experience.

demands for

This emphasizes the expectations or needs.

prerequisites for

This highlights conditions that must be fulfilled beforehand.

specifications for

This relates to detailed requirements or instructions.

yardstick for

This uses a metaphor to describe a measure used for comparison.

basis for

This indicates the foundation or reason for something.

FAQs

How can I use "criteria for" in a sentence?

You can use "criteria for" to specify the standards or requirements for something. For example, "What are the "criteria for public art"?" or "The "criteria for entry" are simple."

What are some alternatives to "criteria for"?

Some alternatives to "criteria for" include "requirements for", "standards for", or "qualifications for", depending on the context.

Is it appropriate to use "criteria for" in formal writing?

Yes, "criteria for" is appropriate for formal writing. It is a clear and concise way to refer to a set of standards or requirements.

What is the difference between "criteria for" and "reasons for"?

"Criteria for" refers to the specific standards or requirements used to evaluate something, while "reasons for" refers to the justifications or explanations behind a decision or action.