requirements for

USAGE SUMMARY

"requirements for" is a perfectly acceptable phrase in written English.
This phrase can be used when referring to the specific conditions that are necessary for achieving a particular goal or objective. For example: "The job listing clearly defined the requirements for graduates applying for the position."

✓ Grammatically correct

Academia

News & Media

Encyclopedias

Wiki

Science

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Requirements for guests?

The New York Times - Magazine

But requirements for what?

The New York Times

Rules and requirements for the deliverymen.

The New Yorker

There are a few requirements for newcomers.

The New York Times

Requirements for the practice of optometry vary.

Encyclopedia Britannica

China increased reserve requirements for banks.

The New York Times

His requirements for oxygen and fluids diminished.

The New Yorker

What are the basic requirements for life?

Encyclopedia Britannica

The requirements for a film vary greatly.

Encyclopedia Britannica

Reintegration has its own requirements for success.

The New York Times

Tells about the regulatory requirements for blasters.

The New Yorker

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "requirements for", ensure the noun following "for" is specific and clearly defines what the requirements apply to. Vague nouns can lead to ambiguity.

Common error

Avoid listing overly broad or generic “requirements for” a role or task. Ensure each requirement is specific, measurable, achievable, relevant, and time-bound (SMART).

Linguistic Context

The phrase "requirements for" functions as a prepositional phrase, typically modifying a noun to specify conditions, qualifications, or necessities. As Ludwig AI confirms, this is a standard and acceptable use in English. Many examples found show that it is largely used to describe rules that should be followed.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Academia

20%

News & Media

24%

Wiki

24%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

8%

Science

8%

Formal & Business

8%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "requirements for" is a very common and grammatically correct phrase used to specify the necessary conditions or prerequisites for something. As confirmed by Ludwig AI, it functions as a prepositional phrase and is versatile across various contexts, including academia, news, encyclopedias and general writing. When employing this phrase, precision is crucial; ensure the noun following "for" is specific to avoid ambiguity. While it's suitable for professional and formal communication, overly broad statements should be avoided. Considering alternatives like "prerequisites for" or "criteria for" can enhance clarity and precision depending on the context.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

prerequisites for

Replaces "requirements" with a synonym emphasizing conditions that must be met beforehand.

necessities for

Substitutes "requirements" with a term highlighting essential needs.

criteria for

Replaces "requirements" to focus on the standards used for judgment or decision-making.

qualifications for

Highlights the specific qualities or abilities needed.

conditions for

Emphasizes the circumstances or stipulations that must be satisfied.

demands for

Focuses on what is firmly requested or needed.

specifications for

Highlights detailed descriptions of what is needed.

essentials for

Replaces "requirements" with what is absolutely indispensable.

provisions for

Focuses on what is supplied or arranged to meet a need.

stipulations for

Emphasizes conditions that are specified or demanded as part of an agreement.

FAQs

How can I use "requirements for" in a sentence?

You can use "requirements for" to specify the necessary conditions for something. For example, "The requirements for the scholarship include a minimum GPA of 3.5."

What are some alternatives to "requirements for"?

Alternatives include "prerequisites for", "criteria for", or "qualifications for", depending on the context.

Is there a difference between "requirements for" and "needs for"?

While similar, "requirements for" often implies mandatory conditions, whereas "needs for" can refer to desirable but not necessarily mandatory elements. "Requirements" carries a stronger sense of obligation.

How do I determine the "requirements for" a specific task?

Start by analyzing the task's objectives, the resources available, and any constraints. Consulting with experts or reviewing similar tasks can also help identify relevant "criteria for" success.