qualified to

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "qualified to" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing someone's credentials or suitability for a specific role or task. Example: "She is highly qualified to lead the project due to her extensive experience in the field."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

59 human-written examples

"He was not qualified to do anything.

The New York Times - Sports

I'm not qualified to judge Atwill's thesis.

Independent

He added: "She's qualified to be president.

The New York Times

You're not qualified to lead us.

The Guardian - Opinion

"Unfortunately, I wasn't qualified to do anything.

The Guardian - Books

Who is qualified to write grants?

The New York Times

What makes you qualified to sing that?

The Guardian

A I am not qualified to say.

The New York Times

He is especially qualified to say so.

The Guardian - Music

There's nobody better qualified to present Today".

The Guardian

So yes, I am qualified to direct.

The Guardian - Film

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "qualified to" when emphasizing that someone possesses the required skills, knowledge, or credentials for a specific task or role. This phrasing adds a layer of formality and credibility.

Common error

Avoid using "qualified to" in very informal situations where simpler alternatives like "able to" or "ready to" would be more appropriate. Overusing formal language can make your writing sound stilted.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "qualified to" functions as an adjective phrase followed by an infinitive, modifying a noun or pronoun by describing the possession of necessary skills, knowledge, or credentials. Ludwig AI confirms its grammatical correctness and usability.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

50%

Science

30%

Formal & Business

10%

Less common in

Wiki

3%

Encyclopedias

3%

Social Media

4%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "qualified to" is a versatile and grammatically sound phrase used to express that someone meets the requirements for a particular task or role. As Ludwig AI states, it is correct and usable in written English. While "qualified to" is very common, it is important to consider the context and choose alternative phrases like "eligible to" or "competent to" in informal settings. By understanding the nuances of "qualified to", you can enhance the clarity and precision of your writing.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

eligible to

Focuses on meeting specific requirements or conditions to be allowed to do something.

competent to

Emphasizes having the necessary skills and knowledge to perform effectively.

capable of

Highlights the inherent ability or potential to do something.

authorized to

Implies having official permission or sanction to perform an action.

entitled to

Suggests having a legal or moral right to do something.

able to

A more general term indicating the capacity or possibility to do something.

fit to

Indicates suitability or appropriateness for a particular purpose or role.

equipped to

Focuses on having the necessary resources, tools, or training to handle a task.

suited to

Suggests being well-matched or appropriate for a specific role or situation.

prepared to

Highlights readiness and willingness to undertake a particular action or task.

FAQs

How can I use "qualified to" in a sentence?

Use "qualified to" to indicate that someone has the necessary skills, experience, or credentials for a particular task or role. For example, "She is "highly qualified to" lead the project."

What are some alternatives to "qualified to"?

You can use alternatives like "eligible to", "competent to", or "capable of" depending on the specific context. Each emphasizes a slightly different aspect of ability or authorization.

When is it appropriate to use "qualified to" versus "able to"?

"Qualified to" is more formal and suggests specific qualifications or credentials. "Able to" is more general and simply indicates the capacity to do something. Choose "qualified to" when highlighting expertise or official authorization.

Is "qualified to" always the best choice for expressing someone's ability?

No, sometimes simpler language is better. While "qualified to" is correct, phrases like "prepared to", "ready to", or even just "able to" may be more suitable in less formal contexts.