prepared in duplicate

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "prepared in duplicate" is correct and usable in written English.
It is typically used in formal contexts, such as legal or business documents, to indicate that two copies of a document have been created. Example: "The contract was prepared in duplicate, with one copy for each party to retain."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Samples were prepared in duplicate batches and transported within 1 wk of preparation to the McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research, University of Cambridge.

American Journal of Clinical Nutrition

Treated control samples were prepared in duplicate.

AMB Express

The test samples and standards were prepared in duplicate.

EJNMMI Research

Six measurements were made on each of the samples, which were prepared in duplicate.

Heritage Science

The plates were prepared in duplicate and incubated at 37°C for 48 h.

AMB Express

Solutions were prepared in duplicate one for calibration standards and one for quality control.

Chemistry Central Journal

All samples were prepared in duplicate and one set was agitated to simulate mixing in surface waters.

Journal of Hydrology

All the treatments were prepared, in duplicate, in distilled water (pH 2.0) for a total volume of 50 ml.

Geochemical Transactions

The sample used in the dynamic light scattering (DLS) studies was prepared in duplicate and contained 4.3 mg/mL PS-b-PEO.

EJNMMI Research

Samples were prepared in duplicate.

Plosone

All plates were prepared in duplicate.

Plosone

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "prepared in duplicate", ensure that the context clearly explains why the duplication is necessary, such as for verification, comparison, or increased reliability.

Common error

Avoid using "prepared in duplicate" without a clear reason for the redundancy. State explicitly the benefit of having two samples, such as confirming results or mitigating errors.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "prepared in duplicate" functions as an adjective phrase specifying the manner in which something was prepared. Ludwig AI confirms its prevalent use in scientific contexts.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

100%

Less common in

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "prepared in duplicate" is a common and grammatically correct expression, predominantly used in scientific and formal contexts to emphasize the creation of two identical samples or documents for verification, reliability, or comparison purposes. Ludwig AI confirms its suitability for formal writing. When using this phrase, it's important to ensure the reason for duplication is clear and contributes to the overall clarity and rigor of the document or experiment.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

prepared in replicate

Indicates a similar concept of preparing multiple samples, but may imply more than two.

arranged in duplicate

Focuses on the arrangement or organization of items in two identical sets.

made in duplicate

A more straightforward alternative emphasizing the creation of two identical copies.

created in duplicate

Highlights the act of creating two instances of something, often used in a formal context.

produced in duplicate

Implies a process of manufacturing or generating two identical items.

done in duplicate

A more casual alternative, referring to performing an action twice.

processed in duplicate

Focuses on the duplication aspect during data processing

analyzed in duplicate

Emphasizes performing an analysis or evaluation twice for verification.

run in duplicate

Emphasizes the execution of a process or experiment twice

repeated in duplicate

Indicates the act of repeating a process or experiment a second time.

FAQs

How do I use "prepared in duplicate" in a sentence?

You can use "prepared in duplicate" to describe an action done twice for accuracy or comparison, such as: "The samples were "prepared in duplicate" to ensure the results were consistent."

What are some alternatives to "prepared in duplicate"?

Alternatives include phrases like "prepared in replicate", "made in duplicate", or "created in duplicate", depending on the context.

Is it necessary to specify why something was "prepared in duplicate"?

While not always mandatory, specifying the reason (e.g., for verification, to reduce error) adds clarity and strengthens the rationale behind the experimental design or process.

What's the difference between "prepared in duplicate" and "prepared in triplicate"?

"Prepared in duplicate" means something was prepared two times. "Prepared in triplicate" means it was prepared three times. The choice depends on the level of redundancy and error mitigation required.