prejudicial effects

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "prejudicial effects" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in contexts discussing negative impacts or consequences, particularly in legal, medical, or social discussions. Example: "The study revealed that the new policy could lead to prejudicial effects on minority groups."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

5 human-written examples

And fans of Mecca Cola and Iran's Zam Zam Cola have found a way around Coke's American origins, but may not have considered its prejudicial effects on health.

The Guardian - Lifestyle

However, dialysis may in itself, also have prejudicial effects on the nervous system.

The Journal of Headache and Pain

Thus, the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) has held that "[w]hen a general policy or measure has disproportionately prejudicial effects on a particular group, it is not excluded that this may be considered as discriminatory notwithstanding that it is not specifically aimed or directed at that group".

SEP

Reduced early commitment to apoptosis eliminated the prejudicial effects of the loss of cells to a 'dying fraction'.

British Journal of Cancer

On the other hand, hemoconcentration, defined in a recent Cochrane review as values of hemoglobin >130 g/L at the 2nd trimester of gestation [ 4], has been associated with prejudicial effects in the mother and fetus.

BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

50 human-written examples

The experience of film — and, in particular, of music in film — has probably had a prejudicial effect on the way people view live opera.

The New Yorker

Judges routinely exclude evidence when its prejudicial effect outweighs its probative value — an odd phrase that can be explained with an example from Hitt's article.

The New Yorker

But Judge Mukasey decided against holding the developer in contempt because Mr. Silverstein's comments had not affected the jury and the finding could have a "highly prejudicial effect" on the trial.

The New York Times

While we have previously indicated that work will not start on the review until it is clear it will have no prejudicial effect on any future cases, we are not at that stage yet," the FCA said.

The Guardian - Business

In a hearing without the jury present, prosecutors and lawyers for Andersen argued about the relevance and possible prejudicial effect of telling the jury about employees who would not testify.

The New York Times

Questions could also be raised about the prejudicial effect of statements by military officials, and even by the commander in chief, President Obama, who spoke of the "murderous and craven acts" at the memorial service.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When discussing legal or ethical implications, use "prejudicial effects" to highlight bias or unfairness resulting from a specific action or policy.

Common error

Avoid using "prejudicial effects" when simply describing negative outcomes without an element of bias or unfairness. Opt for terms like "negative impacts" or "adverse effects" in those scenarios.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "prejudicial effects" functions primarily as a noun phrase, where 'prejudicial' modifies 'effects'. It describes negative consequences that are biased or unfair. As Ludwig AI confirms, this phrase is grammatically sound and usable.

Expression frequency: Rare

Frequent in

News & Media

40%

Science

40%

Encyclopedias

20%

Less common in

Formal & Business

0%

Reference

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "prejudicial effects" is a grammatically correct and usable term that describes negative consequences with an element of bias or unfairness. While Ludwig AI confirms its validity, it's important to use it accurately, particularly in legal, ethical, or social discussions. Its usage leans towards formal contexts, often appearing in news and scientific sources. Alternatives such as "biased consequences" or "harmful impacts" may be more appropriate depending on the intended meaning. By understanding these nuances, writers can effectively convey the intended message with precision and clarity.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

harmful impacts

Focuses on the damaging nature of the effects.

adverse consequences

Highlights the negative and unfavorable results.

detrimental outcomes

Stresses the harmful and damaging results.

discriminatory impacts

Highlights the discriminatory nature of the effects.

negative ramifications

Stresses the negative and far-reaching implications.

biased consequences

Emphasizes the biased nature of the outcomes.

inequitable outcomes

Highlights the lack of equity in the results.

unfair repercussions

Focuses on the unfairness of the resulting actions.

unjust outcomes

Highlights the lack of justice in the resulting effects.

skewed results

Emphasizes the distorted and biased nature of the outcomes.

FAQs

How can I use "prejudicial effects" in a sentence?

You can use "prejudicial effects" to describe situations where certain actions or policies lead to unfair or biased outcomes. For example, "The new regulations could have "prejudicial effects" on small businesses".

What's the difference between "prejudicial effects" and "harmful effects"?

"Prejudicial effects" specifically implies bias or unfairness, while "harmful effects" simply refers to negative consequences. Thus, "harmful effects" may not always involve bias.

What can I say instead of "prejudicial effects"?

You can use alternatives like "biased consequences", "discriminatory impacts", or "unfair repercussions" depending on the context.

Is "prejudicial effects" formal or informal language?

"Prejudicial effects" is generally considered formal language, suitable for legal, academic, and professional contexts. In more casual settings, you might opt for simpler terms like "negative impacts".