not accompanied by

USAGE SUMMARY

"not accompanied by" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when you are discussing two things that are not being accompanied or associated together. For example: "He arrived at the party not accompanied by a friend."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

59 human-written examples

It was not accompanied by a passenger.

The Guardian

"The ambassador was not accompanied by guards".

The New York Times

"It's not accompanied by any of the warnings".

The New York Times

He was not accompanied by a security detail, officials said.

The New York Times

They rode in a lightly armored Toyota Land Cruiser and were not accompanied by guards.

The New York Times

The convoy was not accompanied by armored personnel carriers, standard practice for most of the war.

The New York Times

The fact of perusal of pornography is UNCLASSIFIED when not accompanied by any specific detail.

The New Yorker

Induction into the Hall of Fame is not accompanied by a generous cash stipend.

The New York Times

International organizations realize that increased productivity means little if it's not accompanied by market growth.

The New York Times - Magazine

(Sexual transgressions tend to lose their punch when not accompanied by even partial nudity).

The New York Times

That's because the sales were not accompanied by prospectuses outlining the risks.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "not accompanied by", ensure that the sentence clearly indicates what is missing or absent. Clarity in specifying what is not present is crucial for effective communication.

Common error

Avoid using "not accompanied by" when the absence is irrelevant or expected. For instance, stating "the sun was not accompanied by rain in the desert" is redundant, as rain is generally infrequent in deserts. Focus on absences that are noteworthy or unexpected.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "not accompanied by" functions as a modifier, indicating the absence of something in relation to a subject. It describes a state of being where something is lacking a typical or expected companion. As Ludwig AI confirms, this expression is widely used and grammatically sound.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

38%

News & Media

54%

Wiki

5%

Less common in

Formal & Business

3%

Reference

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "not accompanied by" is a versatile phrase used to indicate the absence of something expected or associated with a subject. As Ludwig AI confirms, it is grammatically correct and frequently used in various contexts, including news, science, and general writing. Common alternatives include ""unaccompanied by"" and ""without being accompanied by"". When using "not accompanied by", ensure you clearly specify what is missing to avoid ambiguity. While generally neutral in tone, its effectiveness lies in making explicit the absence of a particular element. With examples sourced from authoritative sources such as The New York Times and The Guardian, using "not accompanied by" correctly enhances clarity and precision in writing.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

unaccompanied by

A more concise way of expressing the same meaning.

without being accompanied by

Emphasizes the absence of accompaniment, focusing on the action of not being together.

not in conjunction with

Highlights the lack of combination or simultaneous occurrence.

not associated with

Focuses on the absence of a direct link or connection.

lacking the presence of

Stresses the absence of something that might be expected.

not in the company of

Highlights the absence of someone or something being together.

independent of

Implies a lack of reliance or connection between two things.

separate from

Highlights the distinct and unconnected nature of two entities.

not attended by

Suggests the lack of supervision or presence in a formal context.

devoid of

Emphasizes a complete absence or lack of something.

FAQs

How can I use "not accompanied by" in a sentence?

Use "not accompanied by" to indicate that something is lacking or missing from a particular situation or object. For example, "The shipment arrived "not accompanied by" the necessary documentation".

What are some alternatives to "not accompanied by"?

Alternatives include "without being accompanied by", "unaccompanied by", or "not associated with". The best choice depends on the specific context.

Is it better to use "unaccompanied by" or "not accompanied by"?

"Unaccompanied by" is a more concise and often preferred alternative to "not accompanied by", though both are grammatically correct and convey the same meaning.

What's the difference between "not accompanied by" and "not supported by"?

"Not accompanied by" implies a physical or contextual absence, while "not supported by" suggests a lack of evidence or justification. For example, "The claim was not supported by any data", versus "The child was "not accompanied by" an adult".