unaccompanied by

USAGE SUMMARY

"unaccompanied by" is a correct and usable phrase in written English.
It is typically used to describe something that is lacking or without something else. It can be used to explain a situation where something is missing or not present. Example: The actor walked onto the stage unaccompanied by any music or sound effects, creating a powerful and dramatic effect.

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Academia

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Would I recommend it to grown-ups unaccompanied by children?

The New York Times

Would I recommend it to adults unaccompanied by children?

The New York Times

All too frequently liberation goes unaccompanied by liberty.

The New Yorker

Few of their successes have come unaccompanied by agony.

The Guardian - Sport

The increased locomotion was generally unaccompanied by stereotypical behavior in the test session.

Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior

But most of these have been developed for fistulas unaccompanied by coronary artery disease.

International Journal of Cardiology

The impact of ingesting sweet fruit beverages unaccompanied by complete meals, is largely unknown.

Harvard University

Lymphatic vessels unaccompanied by blood vessels were seen growing toward the center of corneas with DED.

Harvard University

The picketing was peaceful at all times and unaccompanied by either threats or violence.

Harvard University

Similar processes may help explain large uplift unaccompanied by eruptive activity at other volcanoes.

Stanford University

She told him how the sound became a strict calm of long corridors, unaccompanied by anything.

The New Yorker

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "unaccompanied by" to clearly indicate the absence of something, ensuring the sentence's meaning is precise and avoids ambiguity. This is particularly useful in formal and scientific writing.

Common error

Avoid using "unaccompanied by" in casual conversations. Simpler terms like "without" or "missing" are more appropriate for informal settings.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "unaccompanied by" functions as a prepositional phrase, modifying a noun or verb by indicating what is lacking or absent. As Ludwig AI confirms, it's a correct and usable phrase in English. Examples from Ludwig illustrate its use in various contexts.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

35%

Science

35%

Academia

15%

Less common in

Formal & Business

5%

Encyclopedias

3%

Wiki

2%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "unaccompanied by" serves as a prepositional phrase to denote the absence of something, carrying a neutral to formal tone suitable for diverse contexts like news, science, and academia. As Ludwig AI confirms, the expression is grammatically sound and commonly utilized. The related phrases provide similar meanings, like "without" or "lacking", allowing nuanced expressions based on context. When writing, aim for clarity by using "unaccompanied by" to make information explicit and precise.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

without

Implies a simple absence, less formal than "unaccompanied by".

missing

Highlights the absence of something that is expected or needed.

absent of

Indicates a clear absence.

lacking

Focuses on the deficiency or absence of something.

devoid of

More emphatic, suggesting a complete absence.

unattended by

Emphasizes that something or someone is not being supervised or cared for.

in the absence of

Formal and emphasizes the condition of something not being present.

excluding

Indicates that something is deliberately left out.

not including

A more explicit form of excluding.

bereft of

Suggests a sense of loss due to the absence.

FAQs

How to use "unaccompanied by" in a sentence?

Use "unaccompanied by" to indicate the absence of something, for example: "The data was presented "unaccompanied by mineralogical analysis"".

What can I say instead of "unaccompanied by"?

You can use alternatives like "without", "lacking", or "devoid of" depending on the context.

Which is correct, "unaccompanied by" or "without"?

Both "unaccompanied by" and "without" are correct, but "unaccompanied by" is more formal and emphasizes a specific lack, while "without" is a more general term.

What's the difference between "unaccompanied by" and "unattended by"?

"Unaccompanied by" indicates the absence of something or someone, while "unattended by" suggests a lack of supervision or care. The nuance lies in the implication of care or supervision.