Ai Feedback
Exact(5)
Multiple factors suggest exposure misclassification is probable as discussed below.
As the analysis does not account for migration, exposure misclassification is probable.
Exposure misclassification is probable and requires independent verification and analysis to determine if the uncertain exposure estimates have biased E-R patterns.
Even though exposure misclassification is probable, the preliminary results of an ongoing validation study suggest that its magnitude is modest, particularly given the quartile exposure categories used in the current analysis.
As smoking status is based on information recorded in medical records, misclassification is probable, but it is most likely that some smokers would have been categorized as non-smokers rather than the other way; thus, the observed result probably underestimates the true effect.
Similar(54)
As a result, some misclassification was likely.
Thus, some amount of misclassification and overlapping categories is probable.
Some degree of non-differential misclassification of alcohol exposure is probable, but this would be expected to attenuate the true relationship.
This is probable non-differential misclassification, and will bias the results towards the null hypothesis.
Therefore, it is probable that exposure misclassification occurred which is likely to be non-differential because exposure information came from military personnel records and not from study members.
It is probable, therefore that misclassification would err in the direction of women reporting themselves as HIV-negative, and, if this is so, the associations we have drawn may be an underestimate.
Related(18)
error is probable
misclassification is unlikely
bias is probable
misclassification is possible
misclassification is plausible
misclassification is low
misclassification is variable
misclassification is present
misclassification is pivotal
misclassification is bad
misclassification is critical
misclassification is non-differential
misclassification is unknown
misclassification is prevalent
misclassification is rare
misclassification is likely
misclassification is nondifferential
misclassification is inevitable
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com