Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(35)
Although we cannot fully exclude the risk of coding inaccuracies, even after careful screening of medical records, differential misclassification is unlikely, and the conceivably minor extent of non-differential misclassification presumably had a minor impact on reported annual incidence rates (Jurek et al. 2005).
Also, given the ascertainment methods used, misclassification is unlikely in prospective cohorts; all except three (NHEFS-NHANES I, NHANES III, Pima Papago Gila River) included incident cases occurring after age 35 years.
However, misclassification is unlikely for two reasons.
Such a degree of misclassification is unlikely.
Consequently, misclassification is unlikely to have occurred.
However, such misclassification is unlikely to be greater among case subjects then among control subjects.
Similar(25)
Second, laboratory ALT values were used to determine HT so misclassification was unlikely.
For this reason, diagnostic misclassification was unlikely to be a major concern.
Such misclassification was unlikely to have been imbalanced in the two treatment arms or to introduce bias.
We considered such patients to be noncolonized initially, and misclassification was unlikely, given the rarity of truly community-acquired MRSA in our region.
However, this exposure misclassification was unlikely to have been systematically related to disease, and our results may therefore have underestimated the magnitude of a true causal association.
More suggestions(15)
misclassification is difficult
mistake is unlikely
misclassification is less
misclassification is low
misclassification is possible
misclassification is variable
misclassification is present
misclassification is pivotal
misclassification is bad
misclassification is critical
misclassification is non-differential
misclassification is unknown
misclassification is prevalent
misclassification is likely
misclassification is rare
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com