Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

met with criticism

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "met with criticism" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it to describe when someone has received negative feedback and is facing criticism. For example: The new policy met with criticism from many members of the community.

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Encyclopedias

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Trump's defense has been met with criticism.

However, the move has been met with criticism.

News & Media

Independent

This explanation has met with criticism and ridicule.

News & Media

The New Yorker

His argument met with criticism from all sides.

All lives matter," a phrase that was met with criticism.

News & Media

The Guardian

However, her achievement has been met with criticism.

Each of the state's steps has met with criticism.

News & Media

The New York Times

This proposal has been met with criticism from technologists and privacy advocates alike.

The new cabinet was met with criticism from other political parties.

News & Media

The New York Times

The Blok Commission's report was met with criticism in a negatively charged political atmosphere.

His statements echoed previous comments the former mayor made on MSNBC, which were met with criticism.

Show more...

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "met with criticism", clearly state the source and nature of the criticism to provide context and avoid ambiguity. For instance, specify which groups or individuals voiced the criticism and what specific aspects were criticized.

Common error

Avoid using "met with criticism" without providing specific details about the nature and source of the criticism. Statements like "The policy met with criticism" can be vague. Instead, specify who criticized the policy and why to enhance clarity and credibility.

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

81%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "met with criticism" functions as a verbal phrase, indicating that a subject (e.g. a plan, a statement, a person) was the target of disapproval or negative feedback. As confirmed by Ludwig AI, the phrase is suitable for written English and typically denotes the receipt of negative reviews or disapproval. It generally requires context to specify the source and nature of the criticism.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

60%

Encyclopedias

15%

Science

10%

Less common in

Wiki

10%

Academia

3%

Formal & Business

2%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "met with criticism" is a common and grammatically sound way to express that something has received negative feedback or disapproval. Ludwig AI confirms its usability in diverse writing contexts. Its prevalence in news and encyclopedic sources suggests a neutral register. When using this phrase, providing specific details regarding the source and nature of the criticism will improve clarity and impact. Consider alternatives like "faced disapproval" or "received a backlash" for nuanced expression. While commonly used, remember to contextualize the statement to avoid overgeneralization.

FAQs

How can I use "met with criticism" in a sentence?

You can use "met with criticism" to describe a situation where something or someone received negative feedback. For example, "The new proposal "met with criticism" from environmental groups."

What are some alternatives to saying "met with criticism"?

Alternatives include "faced disapproval", "was condemned", or "received a backlash". The best choice depends on the specific context and the intensity of the negative reaction.

Is it better to say "met with criticism" or "received criticism"?

Both ""met with criticism"" and "received criticism" are correct and can be used interchangeably. However, "met with criticism" might imply a more immediate or direct confrontation with the criticism.

What's the difference between "met with criticism" and "met with skepticism"?

"Met with criticism" indicates disapproval and fault-finding, while "met with skepticism" suggests doubt or questioning of something's validity or truth. Skepticism is less harsh and doesn't necessarily imply negativity.

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

81%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: