was condemned

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "was condemned" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to indicate that someone or something was officially declared to be wrong, evil, or unacceptable, often in a legal or moral context. Example: "The actions of the company were condemned by the public for their lack of transparency."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

58 human-written examples

He was condemned.

The New York Times

It was condemned.

The New York Times

I, too, was condemned.

The Guardian - Books

The test was condemned around the world.

The Economist

Nevertheless, Topsy was condemned to death.

The Economist

(One was condemned before I photographed it).

The New Yorker

Its entire supply was condemned.

The New York Times - Health

Their aggressive evangelizing was condemned as hucksterism.

The New York Times

Now perhaps she was condemned to it.

The Guardian - Books

Of course, Paris was condemned to succeed.

The Guardian - Opinion

Amid reports of adultery and violence, Winnie was condemned.

Independent

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "was condemned" to express a strong negative judgment or official disapproval of an action, behavior, or condition. Ensure the context clearly indicates who or what is doing the condemning and the reason for the condemnation.

Common error

Avoid using "was condemned" excessively in emotionally charged writing where more nuanced language might be appropriate. Consider alternatives like "was criticized" or "was questioned" for a less severe tone.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "was condemned" functions as a passive voice construction, indicating that the subject received strong disapproval or judgment from an external agent. Ludwig AI confirms its common usage in expressing negative assessments.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

75%

Science

15%

Formal & Business

5%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

2%

Wiki

2%

Social Media

1%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "was condemned" is a grammatically correct and frequently used passive construction employed to express strong disapproval, judgment, or censure. Ludwig AI confirms the phrase's correctness and widespread use, particularly in news and media contexts. While it effectively conveys strong negative sentiment, writers should consider the tone and severity of the phrase, opting for more nuanced alternatives when appropriate.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

was denounced

Emphasizes public disapproval or censure.

was criticized

Highlights negative evaluation or fault-finding.

was disapproved

Focuses on lack of approval or acceptance.

was censured

Suggests formal reprimand or disciplinary action.

was convicted

Indicates a legal finding of guilt.

was judged

Implies a formal assessment or verdict.

was doomed

Conveys a sense of inevitable negative fate or outcome.

was reprehended

Highlights strong disapproval or rebuke.

was vilified

Emphasizes harsh, abusive criticism.

was ostracized

Focuses on exclusion or banishment from a group.

FAQs

How can I use "was condemned" in a sentence?

Use "was condemned" to indicate that something or someone received strong disapproval or judgment. For example, "The company's unethical practices "was condemned" by the public".

What are some alternatives to "was condemned"?

Depending on the context, you can use alternatives like "was denounced", "was criticized", or "was disapproved".

Is it better to use "was condemned" or "was criticized"?

The choice depends on the severity of the disapproval. "Was condemned" suggests a stronger, often moral or official, judgment, while "was criticized" indicates a less severe negative evaluation.

When is it appropriate to use "was condemned" in writing?

It is appropriate when you want to emphasize a strong negative judgment or official disapproval, often in legal, ethical, or moral contexts. Ensure that the context warrants the severity of the term.