Ai Feedback
Exact(7)
Results depicted in Fig. 5 show modality of the maximum pore throat diameter.
The maximum pore throat diameter is generally about 0.31 5.13 μm with an average of 1.82 μm.
The peak of maximum pore throat is about 1 µm which carries most of the porosity in pore system.
The maximum pore throat diameter, i.e., 10 µm has a low-frequency distribution in these measured core plugs indicating the 'tight' property of this carbonate reservoir.
By identifying the maximum pore throat size with the known minimum entry pressure (Pd), the results of 150 MICP curves matching have been shown in Fig. 4.
It should be mentioned that some of the core plugs show very 'tight' property as the maximum pore throat diameter is smaller than 0.8 µm as shown in Fig. 4 (right).
Similar(53)
The initial replacement pressure is generally lower than 0.1 1 MPa, maximum pore-throat radius is lower than 1 μm, and average pore-throat radius is lower than 0.2 μm.
Initial replacement pressure is generally higher than 5 MPa, maximum pore-throat radius is lower than 0.2 μm, average pore-throat radius is lower than 0.05 μm, mercury injection saturation is below 50%%, and mercury withdrawal efficiency is below 30%%.
For a fixed critical accumulation dynamic value P f, we can get cutoffs of maximum connected pore throat radius using equation r 0 = 2δcosθ/P f when the wetting contact angle of oil water is 0° and interfacial tension at 125 °C is 19.7 mN/m (Table 2).
Substituting the limiting value of the maximum connected pore-throat radius under different critical accumulation dynamics into Eq. (2), a series of cutoff-values for permeability in the accumulation period can be obtained at 125 °C (Table 2).
In the experiment, the interfacial tension of Hg is 485 mN/m, the contact angle is 140° and the maximum injection pressure is 900 psi, such that the corresponding minimum of pore throat radius is 0.12 μm.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com