Ai Feedback
Exact(9)
The DPI and serum albumin of survivors were significantly higher than non-survivors (0.8 ± 0.2 vs 0.5 ± 0.3 g/kg/day, p = 0.001, and 3.2 ± 0.5 vs 2.9 ± 0.5 g/dl, p = 0.03, respectively) while other markers were comparable.
Results The evolution of heart rate (HR), mean arterial pressure (MAP), biological markers were comparable between the two groups over time except a significant decrease in MAP in the OLHF group compared to CHF group only at H6 (P = 0.008) and H12 (P = 0.015) and a significant decrease in C-reactive protein level in the OLHF group at H48 (P = 0.02).
In addition, inflammatory markers were comparable in both groups.
The expression levels of the analyzed markers were comparable to those observed in mouse ESCs.
Accordingly, the expression levels of many cell surface markers were comparable, including CD14, CD68, CD163, CD33 and CD11b.
Reductions in plasma estrogen levels and increases in bone-resorption markers were comparable for each aromatase inhibitor.
Similar(51)
Furthermore, both in SH-SY5Y and LAN-5 the extent of inhibition of RA-dependent induction of these same differentiation markers was comparable to that observed by interfering with Ret (compare Figure 1B to Figure 3A).
The time dependent expression pattern of early and late neural/neuronal differentiation markers was comparable in f-fEBs and stEBs, indicating corresponding differentiation potentials of f-fEBs and stEBs (Figure 5A).
The decrease in metabolic bone markers was comparable to the effect seen with raloxifene.
Of note, the level of expression of these markers was comparable to that of p16, a commonly used senescent marker.
The expression of activation markers was comparable to that of stimulated moDCs (Fig. 3, middle and bottom).
Related(20)
markers were analogous
markers were identical
manifestations were comparable
markers were consistent
markers were equal
markings were comparable
parameters were comparable
traces were comparable
markers were equivalent
markers were parallel
markers had comparable
markers were present
markers showed comparable
markers were normal
markers was comparable
markers were polymorphic
markers were positive
markers were heterozygous
markers were negligible
markers were similar
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com