Sentence examples for major bibliographical databases from inspiring English sources

Searching included major bibliographical databases and search terms: bowel dysfunction, defecation, constipation and irrigation.

Their visibility was assessed as indexing in major bibliographical databases and their impact as citations to published items in these journals in major global citation databases Web of Science and SCOPUS [ 16].

We conducted a comprehensive literature search of the major bibliographical databases (Pubmed; Psycinfo; Embase; Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials) and we examined the references of 22 earlier meta-analyses of psychological treatment of depression.

Our study demonstrated that journals from the countries in the Eastern Mediterranean had an important presence in global science as measured by their visibility – indexing in major bibliographical databases such as MEDLINE, SCOPUS and WoS, and their impact – citations received by articles they published.

A comprehensive literature search of the major bibliographical databases (PsycINFO; PubMed; Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials) was conducted for articles published between 1800 to July 30 2013, and examined reference lists of previous relevant reviews and included papers to locate additional references.

Inclusion in all major bibliographic databases.

Indexing in major bibliographical and citation databases was associated with significantly better adherence to publication and editorial standards.

A systematic search in bibliographical databases resulted in 12 studies with a total of 570 respondents.

A total of 58 reports published in the English language were retrieved from the bibliographical databases.

A systematic search in bibliographical databases uncovered 15 randomized studies involving 1043 individuals that compared ABM to a control training procedure.

Previous research admits their biases associated with (1) negative or ceremonial citations [13], (2) geographical gravity laws in citation practices [17], (3) incomparability of citation counts across fields [10] and bibliographical databases [13, 18 20].