identified for

USAGE SUMMARY

"identified for" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when you want to express that something has been determined or singled out for a particular purpose. For example: "The report has identified some key areas for improvement."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

59 human-written examples

Others fear being identified for different reasons.

The New York Times

He declined to be identified for fear of reprisal.

The Guardian

He doesn't want to be identified for fear of reprisals.

The Guardian - Business

Four other sites had also been identified for potential development.

The New York Times

The bodies were not identified for four days.

The New York Times

The judge was not identified, for security reasons.

The New York Times

(She declined to be identified for exactly that reason).

The New York Times - Food

Kusmunda was one of 16 mines identified for expansion.

The Guardian

Her body had not been identified for five years.

The Guardian

Sixteen domains were identified for further abstraction.

International Journal of Emergency Medicine

Precipitating circumstances were identified for some patients.

Annals of Intensive Care

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "identified for", ensure the reason for identification is clear and specific to enhance understanding. For example, "These genes were identified for their potential role in disease resistance".

Common error

Avoid using "identified for" without clearly stating what something has been identified for. A statement like "The issue was identified" lacks necessary context. Instead, specify the intended action or purpose: "The issue was identified for immediate resolution".

Linguistic Context

The phrase "identified for" acts as a verb phrase, specifically a passive construction, indicating that something has been recognized or singled out for a particular reason or purpose. As Ludwig AI indicates, this phrase is commonly used and grammatically correct.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

59%

News & Media

35%

Formal & Business

6%

Less common in

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "identified for" is a versatile phrase that indicates something has been recognized or designated for a specific purpose. Ludwig AI confirms its grammatical correctness and common usage. It is frequently found in scientific and news contexts, implying designation or recognition. To use it effectively, ensure the purpose is clearly stated. Consider alternatives like "designated for" or "selected for" to add nuance. Keep in mind that usage and semantic variants may exist.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

Designated for

Uses a different verb with a similar meaning.

Selected for

Implies a choice was made, adding a layer of intentionality.

Chosen for

Similar to "selected for", but can imply a more personal decision.

Marked for

Suggests a clear and distinct designation, often for a specific action.

Earmarked for

Specifically implies setting something aside for a distinct purpose.

Allocated for

Highlights the act of distributing resources to a particular cause.

Reserved for

Conveys the idea of keeping something available for a specific use.

Recognized for

Emphasizes acknowledgement of a quality or achievement, leading to designation.

Specified for

Indicates explicit detailing for a particular role or function.

Tagged for

Uses a more informal term to denote labeling something for a particular use.

FAQs

How can I use "identified for" in a sentence?

Use "identified for" to indicate that something has been recognized or designated for a specific purpose. For example: "These sites were "identified for" potential development".

What are some alternatives to "identified for"?

Alternatives include "designated for", "selected for", or "earmarked for" depending on the context.

Is it better to say "identified for" or "identified as"?

The choice depends on the context. "Identified for" implies a purpose or intended use, while "identified as" suggests categorization or classification. For example, "This area was "identified for" conservation" vs. "This mineral was "identified as" quartz".

What does "identified for" typically imply in scientific writing?

In scientific writing, "identified for" often indicates that a specific variable, gene, or factor has been recognized as relevant or important for a particular study or application. For example, "Specific genes were "identified for" their role in disease progression".