identified as

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "identified as" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when you want to connect a noun or pronoun to a specific object. For example: The suspect was identified as Joe Smith.

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Wiki

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Suspect identified as Sunil Tripathi".

The New York Times - Magazine

Fifteen percent identified as Republican.

The New York Times

They were identified as Sgts.

The New York Times

Four were identified as elderly tribal leaders.

The New Yorker

In it, Younger identified as orthorexic.

Independent

She had always identified as gay.

The New Yorker

She is identified as Sgt. Princess Samuels.

The New York Times - Arts

"You had people identified as suitable customers.

The New York Times

He was eventually identified as Murtaza Ahmadi.

Independent

Mrs. Manford is identified as its founder.

The New York Times

Kelly herself identified as an independent.

Encyclopedia Britannica

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "identified as" to clearly and accurately specify the designation or classification of a subject. This is especially important in formal writing and reporting where precision is crucial.

Common error

Avoid overusing "identified as" in casual conversation or informal writing. Simpler alternatives like "is" or "was" often sound more natural and less stilted. For example, instead of saying "He was identified as the culprit", you could say "He was the culprit".

Linguistic Context

The phrase "identified as" functions as a copular verb complement, linking a subject to a noun or noun phrase that renames or describes it. Ludwig shows examples where it provides specific information about a person, object, or concept.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

51%

Science

25%

Wiki

13%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

2%

Formal & Business

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "identified as" is a versatile phrase used to clearly designate or classify a subject. Ludwig AI indicates that its grammatical status is correct and the phrase is considered acceptable for use in written English. It is most commonly found in news and media, scientific, and wiki contexts. While the phrase is generally neutral, it can be more formal in certain settings. Related phrases include "recognized as", "designated as", and "classified as". When writing, use "identified as" for clarity and accuracy, but be mindful of overuse in informal contexts. By following this guide, you can confidently use "identified as" in your writing.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

recognized as

Emphasizes the act of acknowledging or perceiving something as having a particular identity.

designated as

Implies a formal or official assignment of a specific role or characteristic.

classified as

Suggests a categorization based on shared attributes or criteria.

labeled as

Indicates the assignment of a descriptive term or category.

known as

Focuses on the widespread awareness or public perception of something.

defined as

Highlights a formal or precise explanation of the meaning or characteristics.

regarded as

Shows a particular opinion or estimation held about something.

considered as

Indicates a thoughtful evaluation or judgment of something.

referred to as

Focuses on the specific term or name used when mentioning something.

characterized as

Emphasizes the key traits or features that describe something.

FAQs

How can I use "identified as" in a sentence?

Use "identified as" to specify the designation or classification of a subject. For example, "The suspect was "identified as" John Doe".

What are some alternatives to "identified as"?

Depending on the context, you can use phrases like "recognized as", "designated as", or "classified as" as alternatives to "identified as".

Is it correct to say "was identified to be" instead of "identified as"?

While not grammatically incorrect, "identified as" is generally more concise and preferred. "Was identified to be" can sound redundant.

What's the difference between "identified as" and "described as"?

"Identified as" implies a specific designation or fact, while "described as" suggests a subjective characterization. For example, "He was "identified as" the CEO" versus "He was "described as" a visionary leader".