designated for

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "designated for" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it to refer to something that has been chosen or assigned for a particular purpose. For example, "The materials were designated for the relief effort in the aftermath of the storm."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Academia

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

They exclude weapons designated for decommissioning.

The New York Times

Orosco was designated for assignment.

The New York Times - Sports

Shortly after, he was designated for assignment.

The New York Times - Sports

She is designated for death".

The New York Times

Pitcher TYLER WALKER was designated for assignment.

The New York Times - Sports

How is it designated for use?

The New York Times

Outfielder Raul Gonzales was designated for reassignment.

The New York Times - Sports

Robinson has not been designated for assignment.

The Washington Post

Both players were designated for assignment last week.

The New York Times - Sports

Meanwhile, infielder Josh Satin was designated for assignment.

The New York Times

Aardsma had been designated for assignment last week.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "designated for", ensure the context clearly indicates what is doing the designating and what the intended purpose is. Clarity will improve the overall readability of your writing.

Common error

Avoid overly passive constructions when using "designated for". Instead of "The area was designated for parking", consider "They designated the area for parking" for a more direct and engaging sentence.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "designated for" primarily functions as a prepositional phrase modifying a noun or pronoun. It indicates the intended purpose or recipient of something, aligning with Ludwig's analysis.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

45%

Science

25%

Academia

15%

Less common in

Formal & Business

5%

Wiki

5%

Reference

5%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "designated for" is a common and grammatically sound way to indicate that something has been specifically chosen or assigned for a particular purpose. As confirmed by Ludwig, its use is appropriate across a wide range of contexts, from news reports to scientific articles. While generally neutral to formal, writers should ensure clarity by specifying the designator and the intended purpose. Alternatives like "intended for" or "assigned to" can be used, but "designated for" offers a precise and authoritative tone. With numerous examples available, understanding its function and purpose is straightforward.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

intended for

Focuses on the purpose or intention behind the designation.

assigned to

Emphasizes the act of allocation or assignment to a specific purpose or recipient.

earmarked for

Highlights the setting aside of something, typically funds, for a particular use.

reserved for

Implies that something is kept available for a specific person or purpose.

allocated to

Similar to 'assigned to' but often used in the context of resources or funds.

set aside for

Stresses the action of keeping something separate for a specific reason.

specified for

Highlights that the designation is precise and clearly defined.

purposed for

A less common but still valid way of indicating that something is meant for a particular purpose.

destined for

Suggests a future outcome or purpose that is predetermined.

marked for

Implies that something has been identified for a specific, often negative, purpose.

FAQs

How is "designated for" used in a sentence?

The phrase "designated for" indicates something has been chosen or assigned a specific purpose. For example, "This area is designated for research purposes".

What can I say instead of "designated for"?

You can use alternatives like "intended for", "assigned to", or "earmarked for", depending on the context.

Is it better to say "designated to" or "designated for"?

"Designated for" is generally used to indicate a purpose, while "designated to" indicates an assignment of responsibility. For example, "This area is designated for parking", versus, "He was designated to lead the project".

What does it mean when a baseball player is "designated for assignment"?

In baseball, when a player is "designated for assignment", it means the team has removed him from their 40-man roster. This creates roster space, and the team then has a period to trade, release, or send the player to the minor leagues if he clears waivers.