Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
has been tested using
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "has been tested using" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when describing a method or process that has been employed to evaluate or assess something, typically in scientific or technical contexts. Example: "The new drug has been tested using a double-blind study to ensure its efficacy and safety."
✓ Grammatically correct
Science
Alternative expressions(4)
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
60 human-written examples
In order to compare with other published algorithms, the proposed approach has been tested using the widely-used FERET database.
The algorithm has been tested using simulated pp-collision data.
Each architecture has been tested using a simulation program.
the model has been tested using representative scheduling problems from the chemical process industry.
Performance has been tested using water and compressed air as test fluids.
Science
The design concept has been tested using 12,13C ions produced in heavy ion reactions.
The resulting software implementation has been tested using publicly available collections of archetypes for both standards.
The functionality of the repository has been tested using several biorefining related scenarios.
A prototype has been tested using a positron test beam at DESY.
The performance of the new concentrator has been tested using calorimetric and radiometric measurements.
Science
The client server architecture has been tested using the signal viewer client jScope.
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
Use "has been tested using" when you want to highlight the specific tool, method, or data set employed during the evaluation process.
Common error
Avoid overuse of the passive voice with "has been tested using". Instead, consider rephrasing to emphasize the actor performing the test for a more direct and engaging sentence. For example, instead of "The algorithm has been tested using simulated data", try "Researchers tested the algorithm using simulated data."
Source & Trust
81%
Authority and reliability
4.6/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "has been tested using" functions as a passive construction indicating that a subject has undergone a process of evaluation or assessment. This is based on Ludwig AI, which confirms its correct usage.
Frequent in
Science
100%
Less common in
News & Media
0%
Formal & Business
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
In summary, the phrase "has been tested using" is a grammatically sound and frequently employed construction, especially within scientific writing. As Ludwig AI highlights, it serves to detail the methods and tools involved in testing and evaluation. While acceptable, be cautious of overusing the passive voice and strive for clarity in specifying testing parameters. Alternatives such as "was evaluated via" or "was assessed with" can provide stylistic variation. Remember that while the phrase is technically correct, using active voice is sometimes a better stylistic choice. In conclusion, this phrase is a standard tool for describing research methodologies.
More alternative expressions(6)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
was evaluated via
Replaces "tested" with "evaluated" and "using" with "via", changing the verb and preposition while keeping the meaning.
was assessed with
Substitutes "tested" with "assessed" and "using" with "with", offering a more formal tone.
was validated through
Replaces "tested" with "validated" and "using" with "through", emphasizing the confirmation of accuracy.
underwent testing with
Changes the sentence structure to highlight the process of testing.
was subjected to testing with
Adds emphasis on the testing process as something the subject underwent.
was checked by means of
Replaces "tested" with "checked" and "using" with "by means of", making it a more descriptive alternative.
employed a method of
Significantly restructures the sentence to focus on the method used.
utilized the approach of
Highlights the use of a particular approach during testing.
performance was measured by
Focuses specifically on performance measurement, offering a specific context.
leveraged the tool of
Emphasizes the use of a specific tool in the testing process.
FAQs
How can I use "has been tested using" in a sentence?
The phrase "has been tested using" is used to indicate the method, tool, or data set employed to evaluate or assess something. For example: "The new drug "has been tested using" a double-blind study to ensure its efficacy and safety."
What are some alternatives to "has been tested using"?
You can use alternatives like "was evaluated via", "was assessed with", or "was validated through" depending on the context.
Is it better to use active or passive voice with "has been tested using"?
While "has been tested using" is grammatically correct, using the active voice can make your writing more direct and engaging. For instance, instead of "The model has been tested using data from 2024", consider "Researchers tested the model using data from 2024".
What's the difference between "has been tested using" and "was tested with"?
While both phrases are similar, ""has been tested using"" emphasizes the ongoing or completed nature of the testing process, whereas "was tested with" simply indicates that a test occurred. The choice depends on the specific nuance you want to convey.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
81%
Authority and reliability
4.6/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested