grouped with

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "grouped with" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when referring to items, people, or concepts that are categorized or classified together. Example: "The new products will be grouped with the existing inventory for easier management."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

57 human-written examples

ManPat was second grouped with PatMan and Man while PatMan was third grouped with Man.

EURASIP Journal on Image and Video Processing

Is he fine with being grouped with them?

The Guardian - Music

Some areas with scant data are grouped with others.

The New York Times

Georgia was generally grouped with UConn and Tennessee until that 99-70 byating by UConn.

The New York Times - Sports

I don't want us grouped with tobacco and that's what these recommendations do".

The New York Times

Pots are grouped, with a feel for complementary sizes, shapes, textures and colors.

The New York Times

Next on Ibrahimovic's agenda is the European Championship, Sweden being grouped with Ireland, Italy and Belgium.

The Guardian - Sport

Those who expressed "low prejudice" were grouped with those who were similarly tolerant.

The New Yorker

Degas, naturally, is grouped with his idol Ingres.

The New York Times - Arts

Fourteen are already formally grouped, with an office in Brussels.

The Economist

"If we are grouped with the five boroughs our income limits will come down.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "grouped with", ensure that the basis for grouping is clear to the reader. Specify the criteria or characteristics that justify the association to avoid ambiguity.

Common error

Avoid using "grouped with" when the items being associated have minimal or no relevant connections. Overgeneralizing can weaken your argument and mislead the reader.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "grouped with" functions as a prepositional phrase, often used to describe the relationship between items, people, or concepts that have been categorized or classified together. As Ludwig AI confirms, the phrase is grammatically correct and widely applicable.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

46%

Science

43%

Wiki

2%

Less common in

Formal & Business

2%

Academia

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "grouped with" is a versatile and grammatically sound prepositional phrase used to indicate that items, people, or concepts have been categorized or classified together. According to Ludwig AI, its wide applicability across various contexts makes it a reliable choice for expressing relationships between entities. While alternatives like "classified with" and "categorized with" offer similar meanings, the specific context should guide your choice to ensure clarity and precision. With usage common in news, science, and general writing, mastering "grouped with" enhances your ability to write clearly and effectively.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

classified with

Emphasizes a more formal or structured categorization.

categorized with

Similar to "classified with" but implies a broader, less rigid grouping.

associated with

Highlights a connection or relationship rather than strict categorization.

clustered with

Implies a grouping based on shared characteristics or proximity.

lumped together with

Suggests a less precise or even careless grouping, often implying a lack of differentiation.

placed alongside

Focuses on the physical or conceptual arrangement of items next to each other.

aligned with

Suggests that items share same goals, interest, or characteristics.

consorted with

Implies a less common partnership that is usually intended to reach a common goal.

integrated with

Highlights the combination or merging of items into a unified whole.

compartmentalized with

Suggests items are organized so that they are kept separate from others.

FAQs

How can I use "grouped with" in a sentence?

Use "grouped with" to indicate that items, people, or ideas are categorized or associated together based on shared characteristics. For example: "The new students were "grouped with" experienced mentors."

What are some alternatives to "grouped with"?

Alternatives include "classified with", "categorized with", or "associated with", depending on the specific nuance you want to convey.

Is it correct to say "group with" instead of "grouped with"?

While "group with" can be used, it typically functions as a verb phrase indicating the action of forming a group. "Grouped with" is the past participle form, used to describe something that has already been placed into a group.

What's the difference between "grouped with" and "associated with"?

"Grouped with" implies a more formal or structured categorization, while "associated with" suggests a connection or relationship that may be less rigid or defined.