Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

classified with

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "classified with" is correct and can be used in written English.
For example, you could say "The new student was classified with the other fourth-grade students."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

Encyclopedias

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Classified with the trained classifiers, the vehicle colors were determined in the following steps.

But we aren't classified with anyone who sounds like us.

They were formerly classified with the sunbirds (family Nectariniidae).

Encyclopedias

Britannica

Patients were classified with regard to BMI and treatment protocol.

The Neogregarinida are sometimes classified with the Schizogregarinida.

Traditionally, the slime molds have been classified with the fungi.

Athletes with visual impairment are also classified with the same sport classes.

Some slime molds, for instance, have long been classified with fungi, but now are considered stramenopiles.

Chondrophorines were once classified with another unusual group of hydrozoans, the siphonophores.

Dancers' masks and jewels, such as earrings, bracelets, necklaces, and belts, may be classified with amulets.

Encyclopedias

Britannica

(b d) The representative images of drop impingements in the regions classified with We.

Science & Research

Nature
Show more...

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "classified with", ensure that the criteria for classification are clear and consistent throughout your writing. This helps maintain clarity and avoids ambiguity.

Common error

Avoid using "classified with" for categories that are too broad or vague. This can lead to a lack of precision and weaken your argument. Be specific in your criteria for classification.

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

82%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "classified with" functions as a verb phrase indicating categorization or grouping. It shows that an item or entity is placed into a specific class or category based on shared attributes or criteria. Ludwig AI confirms its common usage.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

48%

Encyclopedias

26%

News & Media

17%

Less common in

Academia

5%

Formal & Business

2%

Wiki

2%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "classified with" is a common and grammatically correct way to indicate that something is categorized or grouped based on shared attributes. Ludwig AI confirms this, showing its frequent use across diverse fields such as science, encyclopedias, and news. While alternatives like "categorized with" or "grouped with" exist, "classified with" often implies a more structured and formal system of categorization. When using the phrase, clarity and consistent criteria are crucial for avoiding ambiguity. By understanding its function and purpose, writers can effectively use "classified with" to organize and present information in a clear and systematic manner.

FAQs

How is "classified with" used in a sentence?

The phrase "classified with" indicates that something is categorized or grouped together with other things based on shared characteristics. For example, "These documents are classified with confidential information."

What are some alternatives to "classified with"?

You can use alternatives such as "categorized with", "grouped with", or "associated with" depending on the context.

Is it better to say "classified with" or "categorized with"?

Both "classified with" and "categorized with" are correct and often interchangeable. "Classified" might imply a more formal or structured system of categorization.

What's the difference between "classified with" and "associated with"?

"Classified with" implies a formal categorization, while "associated with" suggests a more general connection or relationship. Use "classified with" when items are sorted into distinct categories.

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

82%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: