checked for inconsistencies

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "checked for inconsistencies" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when referring to the process of verifying information or data to ensure that there are no contradictions or errors. Example: "Before finalizing the report, all data was checked for inconsistencies to ensure accuracy."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

28 human-written examples

First, the data were extracted and checked for inconsistencies, and then were tabulated and made ready for statistical processing using the programming language Perl (https://www.perl.org/) and the statistical computing environment R (https://www.r-project.org/).org/

Journal of Chromatography A

They were checked for inconsistencies such as missing or erroneous transaction dates.

Journal of Economic Structures

A backward translation from Italian to English was then performed by two other physicians and checked for inconsistencies with the original English text.

Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology

For each statin class, and for each class of adverse events, data was carefully checked for inconsistencies; for instance, errors in the prescription record were identified as outliers in the distribution of calculated daily dosages.

Plosone

Records were checked for inconsistencies.

BMC Public Health

The completed questionnaires were checked for inconsistencies by MA.

BMC Family Practice

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

32 human-written examples

Data were checked for inconsistency, inadmissible values, aberrant distributions and outliers before being standardised into a common data set.

British Journal of Cancer

Therefore, actively checking for inconsistencies, and doing so in a continuous fashion, can be valuable.

Procedia Computer Science

Mulcahy also said the officials could have used a stopwatch while watching the replay monitor to check for inconsistencies.

The New York Times - Sports

Checking for inconsistencies when a concept C is modified requires access to all cases previously classified by C. Following every knowledge base update, these cases are classified again.

Complex & Intelligent Systems

Another interesting future direction would be to use metadata provided by curated sources like DBLP, ACM Digital Library, IEEE Explore, among others, to check for inconsistencies.

Journal of the Brazilian Computer Society

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When reporting research methodology, clearly state that data was "checked for inconsistencies" to demonstrate rigor and attention to detail. This enhances the credibility of your findings.

Common error

While automated tools are helpful, don't solely rely on them. Manual review remains crucial because automated systems might miss subtle inconsistencies or context-specific errors that a human reviewer would identify.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "checked for inconsistencies" functions as a passive verb phrase, indicating an action performed on data or information. Ludwig AI suggests this phrase is correct and usable in written English, denoting a verification process.

Expression frequency: Common

Frequent in

Science

73%

News & Media

9%

Formal & Business

9%

Less common in

Wiki

3%

Encyclopedias

0%

Social Media

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "checked for inconsistencies" is a common and grammatically correct way to describe the process of verifying data for logical errors and contradictions. As confirmed by Ludwig AI, it’s widely used in scientific and formal contexts to underscore the rigor of data validation procedures. When writing, consider alternatives such as "verified for discrepancies" or "validated for accuracy" for stylistic variation. Remember that manual review complements automated checks, improving the integrity of your findings. The phrase appears most frequently in science, news, and formal business contexts, solidifying its position as a standard practice in professional communication.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

verified for discrepancies

Focuses on identifying differences or variations rather than general inconsistencies.

examined for errors

Highlights the process of looking for mistakes or faults in the data.

validated for accuracy

Emphasizes confirming the correctness and truthfulness of the information.

reviewed for contradictions

Specifically targets conflicting elements within the dataset.

assessed for reliability

Focuses on determining the trustworthiness and dependability of the data.

screened for anomalies

Highlights the detection of unusual or unexpected data points.

audited for compliance

Emphasizes verifying adherence to specific rules or standards.

investigated for irregularities

Focuses on uncovering deviations from what is expected or normal.

quality controlled

Implies a broader process of ensuring the data meets predefined quality standards.

error checked

A more concise way of saying that a process was carried out to detect errors.

FAQs

How can I use "checked for inconsistencies" in a sentence?

You can use "checked for inconsistencies" to describe a process of verifying data or information, for example: "The data was "checked for inconsistencies" before analysis."

What is a synonym for "checked for inconsistencies"?

Alternatives to "checked for inconsistencies" include "verified for discrepancies", "examined for errors", or "validated for accuracy".

Is it better to say "checked for errors" or "checked for inconsistencies"?

"Checked for errors" is a more general term, while "checked for inconsistencies" implies looking for contradictions or logical flaws within the data. The best choice depends on the specific context.

What does it mean to have data "checked for inconsistencies"?

Having data "checked for inconsistencies" means that a process has been undertaken to verify the data's internal logic and coherence, ensuring that there are no contradictory or mutually exclusive entries.