verified for discrepancies

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "verified for discrepancies" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in contexts where you want to indicate that something has been checked or examined for inconsistencies or errors. Example: "The financial report was verified for discrepancies before being submitted to the board."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Wiki

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

1 human-written examples

Data from each included trial were extracted by two reviewers (JP, SC) working independently with a structured form, and were verified for discrepancies and tabulated.

BMC Infectious Diseases

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

57 human-written examples

Superior Formatting Publishing verified the discrepancy on its website.

Huffington Post

Thirdly, both findings were compared to verify potential discrepancies.

Health and Quality of Life Outcomes

The lack of scientific evidences complicates the process of verifying the discrepancies.

Bioinformatics

Data from the two entries were then independently verified to check for potential discrepancies.

International Journal of Emergency Medicine

To verify the accuracy of data entry, nearly 20% of the data were re-entered and analysed for discrepancies (error rate < 0.05%).

BMC Psychiatry

For discrepancies observed in given name and sex, general algorithms could then be applied to remove assigned generic names and verify the sex variable in the electronic BCG Registry before conducting further linkages with administrative databases.

BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making

Finally, possible explanations for discrepancies are explored.

Health Economics Review

(Additional reasons for discrepancies are discussed later).

Environmental Science & Technology

Account for discrepancies.

WikiHow

Data were subsequently verified between the reviewers and discrepancies resolved through consensus discussion.

BMC Cancer

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "verified for discrepancies" in your writing, ensure that the verification process is clearly defined. Specify who performed the verification and what methods were used to ensure accuracy.

Common error

Avoid using "verified for discrepancies" without specifying the scope of the verification. Be clear about what aspects were checked and what types of discrepancies were sought to prevent ambiguity.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "verified for discrepancies" functions as a passive verb phrase, indicating that a subject has undergone a process of examination to detect inconsistencies. Ludwig AI confirms its usability, showcasing its role in describing quality control and validation processes.

Expression frequency: Uncommon

Frequent in

Science

40%

News & Media

30%

Wiki

30%

Less common in

Formal & Business

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "verified for discrepancies" is a grammatically correct and usable phrase, commonly employed in science, news and media, and wiki contexts to denote that a process has been checked for inconsistencies or errors. Ludwig AI affirms its validity. While not exceedingly common, it plays a crucial role in professional and academic discourse. Alternatives such as ""checked for inconsistencies"" or "validated for errors" offer similar meanings, but "verified for discrepancies" specifically underscores the act of verifying to find inconsistencies. When using the phrase, ensure to specify the scope and method of verification to avoid ambiguity. Its formal tone makes it suitable for scientific papers, audits, and any document requiring precision.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

checked for inconsistencies

Focuses on identifying inconsistencies rather than specifically verifying the absence of discrepancies.

validated for errors

Emphasizes the validation process to find errors.

audited for inaccuracies

Suggests a formal audit process to uncover inaccuracies.

examined for errors

Highlights a detailed examination with the intent to find errors.

screened for deviations

Implies a screening process to identify deviations from a standard.

confirmed for correctness

Emphasizes the confirmation of correctness by looking for discrepancies.

assessed for irregularities

Focuses on the assessment to find irregularities.

proofread for mistakes

Specifies proofreading as the method to find mistakes.

investigated for anomalies

Suggests a deeper investigation to find anomalies.

quality checked for errors

Highlights the quality check process to uncover errors.

FAQs

How can I use "verified for discrepancies" in a sentence?

You can use "verified for discrepancies" to indicate that something has been checked for inconsistencies or errors. For example, "The data was "checked for inconsistencies" before being published."

What's a good alternative to "verified for discrepancies"?

Alternatives include phrases like "checked for errors", "validated for accuracy", or "audited for inconsistencies", depending on the specific context.

What does it mean to "verify for discrepancies"?

To "verify for discrepancies" means to examine something carefully in order to identify any inconsistencies, errors, or differences from a standard or expected result.

In what contexts is "verified for discrepancies" commonly used?

"Verified for discrepancies" is often used in contexts involving data analysis, financial auditing, scientific research, and quality control, where accuracy and consistency are crucial.