Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
examined for errors
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "examined for errors" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when referring to the process of checking something, such as a document or a piece of work, for mistakes or inaccuracies. Example: "Before submission, the report was thoroughly examined for errors to ensure its accuracy."
✓ Grammatically correct
Science
News & Media
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
2 human-written examples
Before data records can be examined for errors and further reduced for analysis, they must first be converted to meaningful physical units.
Data were examined for errors in real time (in REDCap) and at the end of each day using STATA V.12 check files.
Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources
Similar Expressions
58 human-written examples
She can be poked and prodded now without feeling judged by the hands examining for error, can watch her blood coil up out of her arm without getting nauseated, can take the cold metallic sting of the stethoscope without feeling light-headed at the idea of her own beating heart.
News & Media
The efforts of such companies as Advanced Micro Devices and Reebok International are examined for their errors and effectively contrasted to their more successful competitors [ STMicroelectronics and Nike, respectively].
News & Media
Each microsatellite was examined for genotyping errors using MicroChecker [ 24].
Science
It allows the source code to be examined for programming errors.
The reported univariate and multivariate OR and 95% CI were examined for rounding errors, and adjusted accordingly.
Science
The GPS units were collected and downloaded on the survey days and the data examined for obvious errors or omissions.
Science
Individuals and families were then examined for pedigree errors, and this resulted in a final set of 1,974 salmon being used for the linkage map construction.
Science
For each selected patient with unexpected death, charts were examined for medical errors and rated on a 1 to 5 preventability scale (from very unlikely to very likely) for the preventability of the death.
Science
Each mode was examined for the error in carbon fixed and the amount of absorbed energy.
Science
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
When using "examined for errors" in scientific writing, specify the method or tool used for the examination to enhance clarity and reproducibility.
Common error
While "examined for errors" is often used in the passive voice, consider rephrasing it in the active voice (e.g., "The team examined the data for errors") to make your writing more direct and engaging.
Source & Trust
86%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "examined for errors" functions as a verb phrase acting as a modifier. It describes the action of inspecting something with the specific purpose of identifying and correcting mistakes. As Ludwig AI shows, this phrase is commonly used across various disciplines.
Frequent in
Science
60%
News & Media
30%
Formal & Business
10%
Less common in
Wiki
0%
Encyclopedias
0%
Reference
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
In summary, "examined for errors" is a grammatically correct and versatile phrase used to describe the process of checking for mistakes. Ludwig AI indicates that it finds application in diverse contexts, ranging from formal scientific papers to news articles. While synonyms like "checked for errors" exist, "examined" offers a slightly more formal tone. Be mindful of using the passive voice and specify the methods used for examination where possible.
More alternative expressions(10)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
checked for errors
This alternative uses a simpler verb, "checked", which is a direct synonym for "examined" in this context.
reviewed for errors
Replaces "examined" with "reviewed", suggesting a more thorough and formal inspection.
inspected for errors
"Inspected" implies a detailed and careful examination.
assessed for errors
"Assessed" suggests evaluating the extent or nature of the errors.
investigated for errors
"Investigated" implies a more in-depth inquiry into the source and nature of the errors.
verified for errors
"Verified" focuses on confirming the absence of errors or validating the correctness.
proofread for errors
Specifically refers to checking written text for errors in grammar and spelling.
evaluated for errors
Similar to assessed, but may imply a more formal or systematic process.
screened for errors
Suggests a preliminary check to filter out obvious errors.
audited for errors
Implies a systematic and official examination, often in a financial or compliance context.
FAQs
What does "examined for errors" mean?
It means to carefully check something, like data or a document, to find mistakes or inaccuracies.
How can I use "examined for errors" in a sentence?
You might say, "The code was thoroughly "examined for errors" before deployment to ensure stability."
What can I say instead of "examined for errors"?
You can use alternatives like "checked for errors", "reviewed for errors", or "inspected for errors" depending on the context.
Is it better to say "examined for errors" or "checked for errors"?
Both are correct, but "examined" is slightly more formal. "Checked for errors" is generally more common in everyday language.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
86%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested