Sentence examples for between the chewing function from inspiring English sources

Spearman rank correlation coefficients were computed between the chewing function score and each of the OHIP item responses.

In addition, we computed a Pearson correlation coefficient between the chewing function score and the number of teeth.

Spearman rank correlations between the chewing function score and the OHIP item responses ranged from -0.17 (irritable with other people) to -0.43 (uncomfortable to eat).

We computed the Pearson correlation coefficients between the chewing function score and oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL, as measured using the summary score of the Japanese 14-item Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP-14)) [ 30] as well as between the chewing function score and each of the 7 OHIP domain scores.

In addition, the Pearson correlation coefficient between the chewing function score and the number of teeth was r = 0.34 (N = 491, 95% CI: 0.26 to 0.41), indicating that a greater number of teeth was associated better self-reported chewing ability.

Pearson correlation coefficients between the chewing function score and the seven OHIP domain scores ranged from -0.24 to -0.44 with the highest absolute value observed for the domain 'Physical Disability'.

For the chewing function, the subjects were instructed to chew on a slice of granny smith apple and mark the level of the subsequent pain on the VAS.

In this study we validated the alternate version of the chewing function questionnaire.

The alternate version of the chewing function questionnaire can be used as a stand-alone instrument for perceived chewing ability evaluation because of the demonstrated reliability and validity of scores obtained using the questionnaire in partially dentate patients.

A comparison of the chewing function scores of female and male subjects indicated a slightly lower chewing ability for female than for male subjects (12.0 ± 4.8 units, n = 350 versus 12.4 ± 4.8 units, n = 141, respectively).

That the strongest correlation between each item and the chewing function scores was observed for the item 'uncomfortable to eat)' fitted a priori expectations.