Ai Feedback
Exact(5)
Enrichment of more than two-fold over this background level was considered as positive.
A more than two fold change from the background level was considered significant.
EGFR positivity was defined according to DAKO guidelines, any membrane staining above background level was considered positive.
Specifically, if the highest background peak had an area less than 15-fold of a spiked internal standard of 500 ng/mL, then that background level was considered adequate for deployment and quantitative analysis.
The fluorescent intensity was read, and any reading higher than background level was considered positive, linear range was 1 nM~10000 nM, and testing limit was 0.1 nmoL/L as shown in Figure 4. Lastly, we performed MDR1 C3435T/A SNP testing on genetic samples exacted from the peripheral blood from 45 volunteers.
Similar(55)
Any spot with signal intensity no greater than this baseline level was considered insignificantly different from the background.
A 95% confidence level was considered significant.
All signals below the background noise level are considered as uncertain since they might be a result of noise and/or cross-hybridisation.
The background level was defined as the level at which low level transcription becomes indistinguishable from other background signals.
Therefore spots near the background level have a higher QM if the background level is higher.
With that background, Mr. Husseini was considered Palestinian nobility.
Related(17)
knowledge level was considered
background level was subtracted
background threshold was considered
background level was calculated
background level was reduced
background level was set
background removal was considered
background noise was considered
background level was estimated
background cirrhosis was considered
background signal was considered
background subtraction was considered
background level was used
background level was defined
background level was evaluated
background level was observed
background level was determined
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com