Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
as detailed previously
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "as detailed previously" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to refer back to information that has already been explained or described earlier in the text. Example: "The process for submitting your application is as detailed previously in the guidelines section."
✓ Grammatically correct
Science
Alternative expressions(20)
as mentioned earlier
as previously explained
as described above
as noted above
as already discussed
as outlined before
as noted previously
as shown before
as demonstrated earlier
as indicated above
see earlier
as explained earlier
as mentioned before
as defined previously
as detailed before
as detailed above
as detailed earlier
as outlined previously
as explained previously
as described previously
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
60 human-written examples
The DNA templates for PCR amplification were obtained from venous blood samples, as detailed previously [11].
Science
Positioning activity was also monitored by restriction endonuclease accessibilities using Hae III and Msp I as detailed previously [36], [37].
Science
Briefly, sections were deparaffinized, rehydrated, and antigen retrieved before blocking of nonspecific binding sites, as detailed previously [28].
Science
Experiments were carried out as detailed previously.
Science
Linear PEG diacrylate was synthesized as detailed previously.
Science
Disc tissue was removed as detailed previously [ 37].
The [H]- l-leucine uptake was performed as detailed previously.
Science
Dye fills were carried out as detailed previously [ 31].
Science
Genomic DNA was extracted from blood as detailed previously [ 26].
Dissociated retinal cell cultures were prepared as detailed previously.
Science
Immunohistochemistry was performed on a single tumour block for CK14 as detailed previously [ 28, 29].
Science
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
When using "as detailed previously", ensure the previous description is easily accessible and sufficiently clear to avoid reader confusion. Cite the specific source or section if possible.
Common error
Avoid using "as detailed previously" if the 'previous' detail is buried deep within a lengthy document or source. Provide a specific page or section number for easy reference.
Source & Trust
80%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "as detailed previously" functions as an adverbial phrase. It modifies a verb or clause by indicating that further information or a detailed description has been provided at an earlier point within the text or in a cited source. Ludwig AI confirms its correct usage.
Frequent in
Science
100%
Less common in
News & Media
0%
Formal & Business
0%
Academia
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
"As detailed previously" is a useful phrase for referring back to information that has already been presented. Ludwig AI confirms its correctness and common usage, particularly in scientific and formal writing. Alternatives such as "as mentioned earlier" or "as previously explained" can be used depending on the specific context and level of formality. When using this phrase, ensure that the previous detail is easily accessible to the reader to maintain clarity.
More alternative expressions(10)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
as mentioned earlier
This alternative is more conversational and less formal.
as previously explained
This alternative emphasizes the act of explanation rather than detailing.
as described above
This alternative is used to refer to information provided directly above the current text.
as already discussed
This alternative highlights a prior discussion of the topic.
as outlined before
This alternative suggests a structured overview was presented earlier.
as noted previously
This alternative focuses on a specific point that was previously highlighted.
as shown before
This alternative is suitable when referring to visual data presented earlier.
as demonstrated earlier
This alternative is used when referring to a demonstration of a process or concept.
as indicated above
This alternative suggests the information was pointed out but not extensively detailed.
see earlier
This alternative is a concise way to direct the reader to prior information.
FAQs
How can I use "as detailed previously" in a sentence?
You can use "as detailed previously" to refer back to a process, method, or concept that has been explained earlier in the text. For example: "The cell preparation was performed "as detailed previously" in section 2.1".
What can I say instead of "as detailed previously"?
You can use alternatives like "as mentioned earlier", "as previously explained", or "as described above" depending on the context.
Is it correct to use "as detailed previously" in formal writing?
Yes, "as detailed previously" is suitable for formal writing, especially in scientific and academic contexts. It's a concise way to refer to information that has already been thoroughly explained.
What's the difference between "as detailed previously" and "as noted above"?
"As detailed previously" implies a comprehensive explanation was provided earlier, while "as noted above" suggests a briefer mention or observation. Use "as detailed previously" when referencing a full description and "as noted above" for a simple reference.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
80%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested